¡@

Home 

c# Programming Glossary: fulfill

Why use MVVM?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2653096/why-use-mvvm

You will actually be able to follow your own code and fulfill the requirement with two lines of code rather than spending..

Code to calculate “median of five” in C#

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/480960/code-to-calculate-median-of-five-in-c-sharp

pointed out in his answer. The built in List.Sort cannot fulfill this requirement since it uses up to 13 comparisons c# algorithm..

Why does (does it really?) List<T> implement all these interfaces, not just IList<T>?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4817369/why-does-does-it-really-listt-implement-all-these-interfaces-not-just-ilis

interface. That's what interface inheritance means if you fulfill the contract of the more derived type then you are required.. of the more derived type then you are required to also fulfill the contract of the less derived type. So a class is required.. read write list of objects. An IList T is not required to fulfill the whole contract of IList so it does not inherit from it...

Does C# support return type covariance?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5709034/does-c-sharp-support-return-type-covariance

expect an Animal and Aquarium promises to not only fulfill that requirement but moreover to make a more strict promise.. with a method that takes an Animal. Again the contract is fulfilled the base class requires that any Fish be handled and the derived..

Correct way communicate WSSE Usernametoken for SOAP webservice

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5836685/correct-way-communicate-wsse-usernametoken-for-soap-webservice

element has been added. What is the correct way to fulfill this contract Edit following the response from @John Saunders..

Why aren't generic type constraints inheritable/hierarchically enforced

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8606390/why-arent-generic-type-constraints-inheritable-hierarchically-enforced

it's inherited from ClassBase T and DanteItem doesn't fulfill its generic type constraint. I could say that generic type on..