¡@
c# Programming Glossary: justificationhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/1335586/good-case-for-interfaces For Interfaces I work at a company where some require justification for the use of an Interface in our code Visual Studio C# 3.5..
public variables vs private variables with accessors http://stackoverflow.com/questions/168169/public-variables-vs-private-variables-with-accessors Name get set This removes what is pretty much the only justification for not implementing public fields as properties in the first..
Should we use “workstation” garbage collection or “server” garbage collection? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1707240/should-we-use-workstation-garbage-collection-or-server-garbage-collection rather than the second. But that's all just after the fact justification. Measure your system's performance as ammoQ said not your GC..
Write Unit tests into an assembly or in a separate assembly? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/271808/write-unit-tests-into-an-assembly-or-in-a-separate-assembly within the assembly you wish to test and if so what is the justification for it c# unit testing share improve this question I have..
Why does C# forbid generic attribute types? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/294216/why-does-c-sharp-forbid-generic-attribute-types section 10.1.4 Class base specification doesn't give any justification. The annotated ECMA C# 2 spec doesn't give any helpful information..
What's a good alternative to firing a stored procedure 368 times to update the database? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3282254/whats-a-good-alternative-to-firing-a-stored-procedure-368-times-to-update-the-d stay within that model but I'd have to provide a very good justification for going outside of our current DAL to get to the DB. Also..
why there is no const member method in c# and const parameter http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4150478/why-there-is-no-const-member-method-in-c-sharp-and-const-parameter Features are extremely expensive there has to be a justification for implementing a feature not a justification for not implementing.. has to be a justification for implementing a feature not a justification for not implementing a feature. Second C# is not a clone of..
C# switch statement limitations - why? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/44905/c-sharp-switch-statement-limitations-why why these restrictions are in place and the underlying justification. I don't see any reason why the switch statement has to succomb.. has to be integral i.e. primitive . Does anybody know the justification c# switch statement share improve this question This is..
Why aren't C# static class extension methods supported? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4909156/why-arent-c-sharp-static-class-extension-methods-supported However as I often point out I don't have to provide a justification for not doing a feature. Features aren't cheap they are extremely..
Dependency Injection vs Service Location http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4985455/dependency-injection-vs-service-location and feel they should be opaque to calling code. My justification being that if a simple class 'D' was originally implemented..
Why doesn't C# have support for first pass exception filtering? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/602066/why-doesnt-c-sharp-have-support-for-first-pass-exception-filtering the main bug. I really doubt there is an official reason justification out there right now. Here's my speculation on the issue My guess..
Why is this switch on type case considered confusing? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6304815/why-is-this-switch-on-type-case-considered-confusing 435760.aspx I read the documentation but I don't get the justification that the situation is confusing. From the article Unfortunately..
Why some types do not have literal modifiers http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8671427/why-some-types-do-not-have-literal-modifiers to customers. The absence of a feature does not need justification. Rather all features must be justified by showing that their.. the literal suffix on long and why is that not also a justification for a similar literal suffix on short Integers can be used for.. cases. Thus the feature is justified. Why is that not a justification for shorts Because first in every context in which a short is..
Restricting a generic type parameters to have a specific constructor http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9741211/restricting-a-generic-type-parameters-to-have-a-specific-constructor question Kirk Woll's quote from me of course is all the justification that is required we are not required to provide a justification.. that is required we are not required to provide a justification for features not existing. Features have enormous costs. However..
|