¡@
c# Programming Glossary: liftedGMail SMTP via C# .Net errors on all ports http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1082216/gmail-smtp-via-c-sharp-net-errors-on-all-ports so far been failing miserably. My most recent attempt was lifted from this stack code here http stackoverflow.com questions 704636..
Generics - where T is a number? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1267902/generics-where-t-is-a-number TimeSpan . Additionally this works for all the inbuilt lifted and bespoke operators and caches the delegate for performance...
Boxing / Unboxing Nullable Types - Why this implementation? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1387597/boxing-unboxing-nullable-types-why-this-implementation more or less like a simple int . That's why C# provides lifted operators. So when unboxing a value type into a nullable version..
how are nullable types implemented under the hood in .net? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2503811/how-are-nullable-types-implemented-under-the-hood-in-net do this special C# rules for comparing to null etc lifted operators in C# and in .NET via EqualityComparer T Comparer..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3183818/nullable-operator-in-c-sharp and conversion operators etc. The C# compiler adds lifted operators which effectively proxy to the original operators..
Why does >= return false when == returns true for null values? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4399932/why-does-return-false-when-returns-true-for-null-values have the following choices. 1 Nullable equality is truly lifted . If one or both of the operands is null then the result is.. with reference types. 2 Nullable equality is not lifted. Nullable equality is either true or false and comparison to..
Overriding button background in WPF on Aero http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4424699/overriding-button-background-in-wpf-on-aero got the whole friggin' control template thrown in there lifted from Aero.NormalColor.xaml . Alas this changes nothing. I then..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4472900/how-is-null-true-a-string binary operator op implementations including their lifted forms become the set of candidate operators for the operation... the predefined binary operator implementations and their lifted forms. These are listing in section 7.8.4 of the spec. If you..
Why do nullable bools not allow if(nullable) but do allow if(nullable == true)? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/447408/why-do-nullable-bools-not-allow-ifnullable-but-do-allow-ifnullable-true is then applied. This isn't quite the same as other lifted operators the result is just bool not Nullable bool . In other..
Why are there no lifted short-circuiting operators on `bool?`? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5204366/why-are-there-no-lifted-short-circuiting-operators-on-bool are there no lifted short circuiting operators on `bool ` Why doesn't bool support.. circuiting operators on `bool ` Why doesn't bool support lifted and They could have lifted the true and false operators which.. ` Why doesn't bool support lifted and They could have lifted the true and false operators which would have indirectly added..
Operator '==' can't be applied to type T? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5808057/operator-cant-be-applied-to-type-t binary operator op implementations including their lifted forms become the set of candidate operators for the operation...
Curious null-coalescing operator custom implicit conversion behaviour http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6256847/curious-null-coalescing-operator-custom-implicit-conversion-behaviour a compiler bug. It appears to only happen when there is a lifted conversion involving two nullable types on the left hand side.. it for null a second time just because we are calling a lifted conversion operator . We'd them optimize it away to just new..
|