¡@

Home 

c# Programming Glossary: optimise

Getting started with socket programming in C# - Best practices

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1162950/getting-started-with-socket-programming-in-c-sharp-best-practices

message indicating that the 'ping' was received. To optimise out needless pings you may want to have a 'time out' mechanism..

Do I need to lock or mark as volatile when accessing a simple boolean flag in C#?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1222184/do-i-need-to-lock-or-mark-as-volatile-when-accessing-a-simple-boolean-flag-in-c

mark it as volatile because if you don't the compiler may optimise out the read in the while loop because it thinks nothing it..

What is the __DynamicallyInvokable attribute for?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12550749/what-is-the-dynamicallyinvokable-attribute-for

another role perhaps informing the compiler on how best to optimise the methods c# dynamic invoke share improve this question..

How do I generate a hashcode from a byte array in c#

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16340/how-do-i-generate-a-hashcode-from-a-byte-array-in-c-sharp

the HashTable or Dictionary will need to use the hash to optimise retrieval. How long do you expect the data to be How random..

Do you use curly braces for additional scoping? [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/249009/do-you-use-curly-braces-for-additional-scoping

on deallocating and allocating I think some compilers can optimise on this Or is it better to use different variable names altogether..

.Net vs Java Garbage Collector

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/492703/net-vs-java-garbage-collector

option is the use of the server or client collectors which optimise for throughput verses latency respectively. Active research..

Byte for byte serialization of a struct in C#

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/628843/byte-for-byte-serialization-of-a-struct-in-c-sharp

that point of course you're reducing the CLR's ability to optimise a bit you'll end up with unaligned access loss of atomicity..

Get previous and next item in a IEnumerable using LINQ

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8759849/get-previous-and-next-item-in-a-ienumerable-using-linq

In general you can't have both the rule of thumb is if you optimise for speed it'll cost memory if you optimise for memory it'll.. is if you optimise for speed it'll cost memory if you optimise for memory it'll cost you speed. There is a better option that..

how to write super fast file streaming code in C#?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/955911/how-to-write-super-fast-file-streaming-code-in-c

Also if you're writing very small files you may want to optimise for that situation too the easiest way to do that would probably..