c# Programming Glossary: scopes

Do try/catch blocks hurt performance when exceptions are not thrown?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1308432/do-try-catch-blocks-hurt-performance-when-exceptions-are-not-thrown

it seems to only apply when a variable is shared between scopes. I'm not asking about maintainability of the code or even handling..

Pattern for calling WCF service using async/await

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18284998/pattern-for-calling-wcf-service-using-async-await

small issues regarding the disposal of operation context scopes since they only allow you to dispose them on the calling thread..

Handling exceptions thrown by “Dispose” while unwinding nested “using” statements

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19238521/handling-exceptions-thrown-by-dispose-while-unwinding-nested-using-statement

when IDisposable objects are used to wrap locks or other scopes where an object's invariants may temporarily be invalidated..

Do you use curly braces for additional scoping? [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/249009/do-you-use-curly-braces-for-additional-scoping

to access basis Or is it actually silly How about using scopes just so that you can use the same variable names in different.. so that you can use the same variable names in different scopes but in the same bigger scope Or is it a better practise to reuse..

variable scope in statement blocks

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2693138/variable-scope-in-statement-blocks

it is perfectly legal to have two things in two different scopes that have the same name even if those scopes nest. What is not.. two different scopes that have the same name even if those scopes nest. What is not legal is to have one simple name mean two..

C# Captured Variable In Loop

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/271440/c-sharp-captured-variable-in-loop

of implementation if you refer to variables in multiple scopes but it works Note that a more common occurrence of this problem..

Child Scope & CS0136

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/296755/child-scope-cs0136

is how you can have the same variable within two child scopes in a single method so this is valid string thisWorks string.Empty.. it's simpler in terms of language complexity to consider scopes as just blocks so all local variables declared in the same block.. too as what gets captured depends on the scope and nested scopes make life interesting... EDIT The language spec has this to..

Scope of variables in C#

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3979493/scope-of-variables-in-c-sharp

important thing to notice is that variables in internal scopes such as the variable b which was at the if scope is declared..

How to implement single instance per machine application?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4223061/how-to-implement-single-instance-per-machine-application

The MSDN topic on the Mutex object explains about the two scopes for a Mutex object and highlights why this is important when..

Why can't a duplicate variable name be declared in a nested local scope?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6156449/why-cant-a-duplicate-variable-name-be-declared-in-a-nested-local-scope

you should be able to do something like this since their scopes do not overlap static void Main int i int i This code fails..

C# switch variable initialization: Why does this code NOT cause a compiler error or a runtime error?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/864153/c-sharp-switch-variable-initialization-why-does-this-code-not-cause-a-compiler

the switch statement here. There's no creation of variable scopes going on at all in fact. Don't let the fact that just because.. suggests. goto case 1 If you specifically wanted to create scopes for each case within the switch block you could do the following...