¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: abuseWhat makes Scala's operator overloading “good”, but C++'s “bad”? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1098303/what-makes-scalas-operator-overloading-good-but-cs-bad bad even in C . The problem is when bad programmers abuse it. But frankly I'm of the opinion that taking away programmers.. I'm of the opinion that taking away programmers ability to abuse operator overloading doesn't put a drop in the bucket of fixing.. the bucket of fixing all the things that programmers can abuse. The real answer is mentoring. http james iry.blogspot.com 2009..
C# generics compared to C++ templates [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1208153/c-sharp-generics-compared-to-c-templates
Does it make sense for unary operators to be associative? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12961351/does-it-make-sense-for-unary-operators-to-be-associative says exactly that 5.2 1 and 5.3 1 in C 03 . It might be an abuse of terminology or at least a new coinage to refer to this unary..
Is is_constexpr possible in C++11? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13299394/is-is-constexpr-possible-in-c11 for the first bullet not to apply and this is what we abuse. We need the other bullets to not apply aswell but thanksfully..
Is there a proper 'ownership-in-a-package' for 'handles' available? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14878121/is-there-a-proper-ownership-in-a-package-for-handles-available a specific smart pointer class won't take long. Don't abuse library classes. Handle semantics is quite different from that..
Why does C# not provide the C++ style 'friend' keyword? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/203616/why-does-c-sharp-not-provide-the-c-style-friend-keyword programming is more or less considered dirty and easy to abuse. It breaks the relationships between classes and undermines..
C++ RTTI Viable Examples [closed] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/238452/c-rtti-viable-examples interesting. Still there exist a lot of more ways to abuse it than to use it correctly the RTTI switch dread comes to mind..
May volatile be in user defined types to help writing thread-safe code http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2491495/may-volatile-be-in-user-defined-types-to-help-writing-thread-safe-code checking along with use of mutex for thread safe code is abuse of the volatile keyword IMHO it's pretty smart but i have come..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2674736/loading-a-dll-from-a-dll DllMain like function so you aren't immediately tempted to abuse of it and 2 Linux applications as far as I saw tend to use less..
Why does the “static” keyword have so many meanings in C and C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4615192/why-does-the-static-keyword-have-so-many-meanings-in-c-and-c of elements. So is there a historical reason for the abuse of the static keyword or is there a secret link under the hood..
Zero cost exception handling vs setjmp/longjmp http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4975504/zero-cost-exception-handling-vs-setjmp-longjmp be used to optimize code in certain cases. Use but don't abuse P.S. I ended up writing an article on this. share improve this..
Generating function declaration using a macro iteration http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5355241/generating-function-declaration-using-a-macro-iteration difficulties if your arguments contain commas. C 's syntax abuse of tokens and as bracketing expressions for templates is particularly..
On the use and abuse of alloca http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5807612/on-the-use-and-abuse-of-alloca the use and abuse of alloca I am working on a soft realtime event processing..
Are there optimized c++ compilers for template use? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/582302/are-there-optimized-c-compilers-for-template-use write template code that does something at compile time we abuse rules of the language. We create dozens of overloads and template..
Singleton: How should it be used http://stackoverflow.com/questions/86582/singleton-how-should-it-be-used thinks they can implement a correct Singleton they abuse the Pattern and use it in situations that are not appropriate..
Is there any real risk to deriving from the C++ STL containers? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/922248/is-there-any-real-risk-to-deriving-from-the-c-stl-containers C container as a base class surprises me. If it is no abuse of the language to declare ... Example A typedef std vector..
|