¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: allocator.hWhy does stack<const string> not compile in g++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13213978/why-does-stackconst-string-not-compile-in-g included from usr include c 4.7 x86_64 linux gnu bits c allocator.h 34 0 from usr include c 4.7 bits allocator.h 48 from usr include.. gnu bits c allocator.h 34 0 from usr include c 4.7 bits allocator.h 48 from usr include c 4.7 string 43 from usr include c 4.7.. 40 from stackoverflow.cpp 1 usr include c 4.7 ext new_allocator.h In instantiation of ˜class __gnu_cxx new_allocator const std..
C++11 emplace_back on vector<struct>? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13812703/c11-emplace-back-on-vectorstruct included from usr include c 4.7 x86_64 linux gnu bits c allocator.h 34 0 from usr include c 4.7 bits allocator.h 48 from usr include.. gnu bits c allocator.h 34 0 from usr include c 4.7 bits allocator.h 48 from usr include c 4.7 string 43 from . test.cpp 1 usr.. 4.7 string 43 from . test.cpp 1 usr include c 4.7 ext new_allocator.h In instantiation of ˜void __gnu_cxx new_allocator _Tp construct..
Question about storing array in a std::vector in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1468058/question-about-storing-array-in-a-stdvector-in-c 4.4.1 .. .. .. .. include c 4.4.1 i586 redhat linux bits c allocator.h 34 from usr lib gcc i586 redhat linux 4.4.1 .. .. .. .. include.. i586 redhat linux 4.4.1 .. .. .. .. include c 4.4.1 bits allocator.h 48 from usr lib gcc i586 redhat linux 4.4.1 .. .. .. .. include.. redhat linux 4.4.1 .. .. .. .. include c 4.4.1 ext new_allocator.h In member function ˜void __gnu_cxx new_allocator _Tp construct..
Why can I not push_back a unique_ptr into a vector? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3283778/why-can-i-not-push-back-a-unique-ptr-into-a-vector bin .. lib gcc mingw32 4.5.0 include c mingw32 bits c allocator.h 34 0 from c mingw bin .. lib gcc mingw32 4.5.0 include c bits.. from c mingw bin .. lib gcc mingw32 4.5.0 include c bits allocator.h 48 from c mingw bin .. lib gcc mingw32 4.5.0 include c memory.. ' c mingw bin .. lib gcc mingw32 4.5.0 include c ext new_allocator.h 105 9 error used here In file included from c mingw bin .. lib..
Why doesn't emplace_back() use uniform initialization? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8782895/why-doesnt-emplace-back-use-uniform-initialization GCC In file included from c 4.7.0 i686 pc linux gnu bits c allocator.h 34 0 from c 4.7.0 bits allocator.h 48 from c 4.7.0 vector.. pc linux gnu bits c allocator.h 34 0 from c 4.7.0 bits allocator.h 48 from c 4.7.0 vector 62 from test.cpp 1 c 4.7.0 ext new_allocator.h.. from c 4.7.0 vector 62 from test.cpp 1 c 4.7.0 ext new_allocator.h In instantiation of 'void __gnu_cxx new_allocator _Tp construct..
|