¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: automagicallyScope vs. Lifetime of Variable http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11137516/scope-vs-lifetime-of-variable to their Scope . In other words automatic variables are automagically destroyed once the scope in which they are created ends.Hence..
Could a smart compiler do all the things std::move does without it being part of the language? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12111040/could-a-smart-compiler-do-all-the-things-stdmove-does-without-it-being-part-of rvalue references would imply that the compiler can automagically write all the move constructors for you. This is definitely..
Producing the fastest possible executable http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1668023/producing-the-fastest-possible-executable are reentrant and the compiler creates the threads for you automagically. 5 I second interjay's point that PGO can be pretty helpful...
How are exceptions implemented under the hood? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1995734/how-are-exceptions-implemented-under-the-hood or DB attributes on your .NET code and the code would then automagically run on the client or in the DB. In order to do that the .NET..
Automatically adding Enter/Exit Function Logs to a Project http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2281739/automatically-adding-enter-exit-function-logs-to-a-project Do you have any suggestions Is there a compiler flag that automagically does this for me Clarifications to the comments I will cross..
How to default-initialize local variables of built-in types in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2584213/how-to-default-initialize-local-variables-of-built-in-types-in-c variable do actual job into something that would automagically default initialize the variable I don't need to assign a specific..
Is the C++ compiler optimizer allowed to break my destructor ability to be called multiple times? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2763275/is-the-c-compiler-optimizer-allowed-to-break-my-destructor-ability-to-be-calle the answer is no C will call the base class destructor automagically anyway . But what if we attempt to do the call As I see it the..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2953530/unique-ptr-boost-equivalent may or may not throw an exception... Now b is destructed automagically. EDIT Right now I'm using this hack which seems like the best.. that may or may not throw an exception... Now b is deleted automagically. c boost c 11 unique ptr share improve this question It's..
C++ Matrix Class - Suggestions http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5633609/c-matrix-class-suggestions currently takes a T take an iterator instead. That way you automagically get the pointers support along with a lot of other cool things..
Why is it allowed to cast a pointer to a reference? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5924248/why-is-it-allowed-to-cast-a-pointer-to-a-reference shown here . My first thought was that the pointer somehow automagically gets dereferenced I work with MSVC normally so I didn't get..
Why should `new` be used as little as possible? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6500313/why-should-new-be-used-as-little-as-possible
Boost python wrapping a virtual method http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6668670/boost-python-wrapping-a-virtual-method protocol and all usual constructs for etc will work automagically. see e.g. here iterator class here for an example Remark don't..
How can I create directory tree in C++/Linux? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/675039/how-can-i-create-directory-tree-in-c-linux if the directories are not there I want them to be created automagically. A working example would be perfect. c linux directory share..
C++11 Fun with initializer lists, arrays, and enumerations http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8606315/c11-fun-with-initializer-lists-arrays-and-enumerations My original intent in asking this question is I want to automagically create an array of Foo objects whose initialization is solely..
|