¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: explicitelyHow can I use the skipper ascii::space WITHOUT skipping eol? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10465805/how-can-i-use-the-skipper-asciispace-without-skipping-eol included in the result qi no_skip qi skip can be used to explicitely change the type of skipper used for the subexpression Recommended..
C++ Constructor/Destructor inheritance http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14184341/c-constructor-destructor-inheritance B does not inherit constructors from A Unless B's ctor explicitely calls one of A's ctor the default ctor from A will be called.. the same prototype than it's parent constructor without explicitely defining a constructor for the derived class is that correct..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17072987/boost-spirit-skipper-issues Therefore here's what I'd write. Note the use of qi eol to explicitely require linebreaks at specific locations the use of qi blank..
How can I distinguish overloads of templates with non-type parameters? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17313649/how-can-i-distinguish-overloads-of-templates-with-non-type-parameters generating an ambiguous call error. If you are ok with explicitely specifying the type of the parameter you want to pass you can..
calling template function without <>; type inference http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2833730/calling-template-function-without-type-inference can set the type by itself I do not have to write the type explicitely when I call the function like template typename T T min T v1.. a void function and handover a reference again I must not explicitely specify the return typename template typename TOut typename.. when writing templates Or is there a possibility to avoid explicitely writing the return type something like type inference for templates.....
C++0x unique_ptr replaces scoped_ptr taking ownership? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3019512/c0x-unique-ptr-replaces-scoped-ptr-taking-ownership comonad's answer but with a caveat Whenever you want to explicitely disallow move semantics use a scoped_ptr const unique_ptr ...
What are some reasons a Release build would run differently than a Debug build http://stackoverflow.com/questions/312312/what-are-some-reasons-a-release-build-would-run-differently-than-a-debug-build by far the most common. In Visual Studio debug builds explicitely initialize allocated memory to given values see e.g. Memory.. undetected for years. In Release builds where memory isn't explicitely initialized it just keeps the contents that it had before. This..
5 years later, is there something better than the “Fastest Possible C++ Delegates”? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4298408/5-years-later-is-there-something-better-than-the-fastest-possible-c-delegate doubts about that with Don's implementation because he explicitely states it's not standard compliant optionaly a KISS syntax and..
Uninitialized pointers in code http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5870038/uninitialized-pointers-in-code problem This will cause ptr to point to NULL which you can explicitely check for as a default uninitialized value. It prevents the..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6108704/renaming-namespaces from _new nested into old without having to typedef explicitely every type Something similar to Python import from ... . Thank..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6251707/default-initialization-in-c is the bar member properly initialized Well Foo3 obviously explicitely initialize it and is only showed here to explicit the difference..
Best way to call Managed .NET code from Unmanaged code http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8406400/best-way-to-call-managed-net-code-from-unmanaged-code want to create a new instance of the runtime and host it explicitely. First the plumbing behind this is not well documented and could..
Is there a way to suppress c++ name mangling? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/902468/is-there-a-way-to-suppress-c-name-mangling is right but for Visual C compilers you need to explicitely export your function anyway. But using a .DEF file as proposed..
|