¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: ivecWhy is using “vector.at(x)” better than “vector[x]” in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11172144/why-is-using-vector-atx-better-than-vectorx-in-c I might use the function .at example for using vector int ivec ivec.push_back 1 Now I can do both things int x1 ivec 0 int.. use the function .at example for using vector int ivec ivec.push_back 1 Now I can do both things int x1 ivec 0 int x2 ivec.at.. int ivec ivec.push_back 1 Now I can do both things int x1 ivec 0 int x2 ivec.at 0 or I heard using at is a better option because..
C++ for-loop - size_type vs. size_t http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4849678/c-for-loop-size-type-vs-size-t in the vector to zero. for vector int size_type ix 0 ix ivec.size ix ivec ix 0 Why is it using vector int size_type ix 0.. to zero. for vector int size_type ix 0 ix ivec.size ix ivec ix 0 Why is it using vector int size_type ix 0 Cannot we say..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5232198/about-vectors-growth is #include vector #include iostream int main vector int ivec cout ivec size ivec.size capacity ivec.capacity endl for int.. vector #include iostream int main vector int ivec cout ivec size ivec.size capacity ivec.capacity endl for int ix 0 ix 24.. #include iostream int main vector int ivec cout ivec size ivec.size capacity ivec.capacity endl for int ix 0 ix 24 ix ivec.push_back..
|