¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: op's

Source line length limit

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10519738/source-line-length-limit

quotes from C 2003 2.1 Phases of Translation So if the OP's concern is that the macros expand to beyond a reasonable line.. a reasonable line length my answer is irrelevant. If the OP's concern is that his source code after dealing with n might be..

Bug with pixel access in OpenCV 2.x

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12463677/bug-with-pixel-access-in-opencv-2-x

Example image from MIT pedestrian dataset Result using OP's code Result using the revised code with j img.cols 3 share..

Any reason to replace while(condition) with for(;condition;) in C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1379246/any-reason-to-replace-whilecondition-with-forcondition-in-c

loop that doesn't increment anything. Update Based on the OP's comment to the question I can speculate on how you might see..

What am I allowed to do with a static, constexpr, in-class initialized data member?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14547986/what-am-i-allowed-to-do-with-a-static-constexpr-in-class-initialized-data-memb

4.1 is immediately applied Emphases are mine In the OP's question variable period clearly satisfies the requirements..

C++ Array vs vector

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1945777/c-array-vs-vector

is right depending on the compiler settings used. The OP's timing suggests an optimized build or an STL without runtime..

Inclusion of unused symbols in object files by compiler in C vs C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1987413/inclusion-of-unused-symbols-in-object-files-by-compiler-in-c-vs-c

with the same question btw. Now I am almost sure that OP's code contains what C calls tentative definition in the header..

Alternate way of computing size of a type using pointer arithmetic

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3387021/alternate-way-of-computing-size-of-a-type-using-pointer-arithmetic

alignment to types as an extension. But I can't break OP's sizeof method with it because GCC refuses to compile it #include..

Perform argument substitution on nested boost::bind without composition

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4091576/perform-argument-substitution-on-nested-boostbind-without-composition

_1 but I still hesitate to recommend it Edit Answering the OP's comment about how if C 0x would help to clean the syntax It..

Factor a large number efficiently with gmp

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4301434/factor-a-large-number-efficiently-with-gmp

language prime and factor are the same clarification from OP's other post What I need is a way to efficiently factor find prime..

Construct object with itself as reference?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4368361/construct-object-with-itself-as-reference

addressed without its value being used. In the case of the OP's copy constructor no error can be given easily since binding..

Declaring a function that return a 2D array in a header file?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4636144/declaring-a-function-that-return-a-2d-array-in-a-header-file

arr I had compiled my original solution only with the OP's given class declaration not the definition of getArr . Just..

Why do some people use swap for move assignments?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6687388/why-do-some-people-use-swap-for-move-assignments

of your choices for each class. Let's take a look at the OP's example in detail std unique_lock unique_lock . Observations..

Why is it a bad idea to use 'new'? [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7620385/why-is-it-a-bad-idea-to-use-new

better Update I think I may have addressed only half the OP's concerns. Many people coming from other languages seem to be.. storage . I feel that this may have been part of the OP's question. The question may have been better phrased as is it..

C-Style upcast and downcast involving private inheritance

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/844816/c-style-upcast-and-downcast-involving-private-inheritance

So dribeas is right compilers are obliged to handle the OP's C style pointer conversion correctly even when B inherits from..

Why is one loop so much slower than two loops?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8547778/why-is-one-loop-so-much-slower-than-two-loops

loop and 2.116 seconds with two loops. This reproduces the OP's results exactly. In the first two tests the arrays are allocated..