¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: optimised

Bit vector and bitset

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13321446/bit-vector-and-bitset

bit_vector has the same interface as an std vector and is optimised for space. It not a part of standard C . This documentation..

Any good C/C++ DSP library?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1761212/any-good-c-c-dsp-library

first and use the vendor's library since that will be optimised for the platform. If the vendor does not have a DSP library.. such as FIR and FFT and Microchip provide a DSP library optimised for the part. ST provide a DSP library for their STM32 parts... slower than dsPIC at DSP algorithms when using optimised assembler libraries they are faster in general at C code execution..

What code have you written with #pragma you found useful? [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2703528/what-code-have-you-written-with-pragma-you-found-useful

#pragma once is preferred for MSVC while GCC compiler is optimised for #ifndef #define #endif . Therefore one should use either..

Is `volatile` required for shared memory accessed via access function?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3148319/is-volatile-required-for-shared-memory-accessed-via-access-function

must be volatile to ensure that the read in ThreadA is not optimised out however if the flag were read via a function thus... volatile..

C++0x Lambda to function pointer in VS 2010

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3351280/c0x-lambda-to-function-pointer-in-vs-2010

static function that could be called instead and hopefully optimised out UPDATED The below seems to work but is it safe #include..

Is this a bug in the Intel C++ Compiler at optimization level 2?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3527829/is-this-a-bug-in-the-intel-c-compiler-at-optimization-level-2

an externally visible side effect the entire loop is being optimised out of existence. It's the same reason that for int i 0 i 10.. It's the same reason that for int i 0 i 10 i could be optimised out of existence as long as i was not volatile stores to volatile.. contention as to whether an infinite loop is allowed to be optimised away in this manner I do not know what the situation is with..

Negative NaN is not a NaN?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3596622/negative-nan-is-not-a-nan

the assert away. Making my own isNaN function is being optimised away as well. How can I check for both equality of NaN and NaN..

How to allow copy elision construction for C++ classes (not just POD C structs)

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5877726/how-to-allow-copy-elision-construction-for-c-classes-not-just-pod-c-structs

Can creation of composite objects from temporaries be optimised away Avoiding need for #define with expression templates Eliminating..

Move semantics - what it's all about? [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6815685/move-semantics-what-its-all-about

With this new move operation defined we can define an optimised swap void swap A a A b A t move t a move a b move b t Another..

What to put in precompiled header? (MSVC)

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/688053/what-to-put-in-precompiled-header-msvc

task and converts it into a binary format that is optimised for the compiler's benefit. Even though the template classes..

What's faster, iterating an STL vector with vector::iterator or with at()?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/776624/whats-faster-iterating-an-stl-vector-with-vectoriterator-or-with-at

a test and find out Edit My bad I thought I was timing the optimised version but wasn't. On my machine compiled with g O2 the iterator..

What happens if I define a 0-size array in C/C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9722632/what-happens-if-i-define-a-0-size-array-in-c-c

at like the variable length in Darhazer's comments are optimised out or not. This is because I have to release some code out..