¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: restrictionWhy C# is not allowing non-member functions like C++ [closed] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1024171/why-c-sharp-is-not-allowing-non-member-functions-like-c method should be part of a class. I was thinking this as a restriction in all CLI languages. But I was wrong and I found that C CLI..
rvalue to lvalue conversion Visual Studio http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11508607/rvalue-to-lvalue-conversion-visual-studio difference. In other words in cases like that the language restriction is purely conceptual artificial. The compiler simply ignores.. conceptual artificial. The compiler simply ignores that restriction. There's no need to transform anything here. The reference is.. is perfectly legal and it works around the aforementioned restriction. You can think of MSVC behavior as being equivalent to this...
Is any part of C++ syntax context sensitive? [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1172939/is-any-part-of-c-syntax-context-sensitive out that you can also restrict grammars with the monotonic restriction where every production must be of the form &alpha &rightarrow..
Legality of COW std::string implementation in C++11 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12199710/legality-of-cow-stdstring-implementation-in-c11 COW based implementations of std string If so is this restriction explicitly stated somewhere in the new standard where Or is.. stated somewhere in the new standard where Or is this restriction implied in the sense that it is the combined effect of the new..
Is C++ context-free or context-sensitive? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14589346/is-c-context-free-or-context-sensitive out that you can also restrict grammars with the monotonic restriction where every production must be of the form &alpha &rightarrow..
How come a non-const reference cannot bind to a temporary object? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1565600/how-come-a-non-const-reference-cannot-bind-to-a-temporary-object by C Standard but I am interested in the purpose of such restriction not a reference to the standard. struct X X ref return this..
Why should I not try to use “this” value after “delete this”? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1866461/why-should-i-not-try-to-use-this-value-after-delete-this of C FAQ usage of delete this construct is discussed. 4 restrictions are listed. Restrictions 1 to 3 look quite reasonable. But.. Restrictions 1 to 3 look quite reasonable. But why is restriction 4 there that I must not examine it compare it with another pointer..
How can I avoid including class implementation files? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2037880/how-can-i-avoid-including-class-implementation-files then use another header 3 . 1 Because of the at most once restriction headers use include guards to prevent multiple inclusion and..
Default template arguments for function templates http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2447458/default-template-arguments-for-function-templates from the function arguments rather than specified. The restriction seriously cramps programming style by unnecessarily making freestanding..
Pure virtual functions may not have an inline definition. Why? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4174694/pure-virtual-functions-may-not-have-an-inline-definition-why it is allowed to provide an in class definition and this restriction seems at first glance absolutely artificial and inexplicable... such on second and subsequent glances But I believe the restriction wouldn't be there if there weren't a specific reason for that... to the committee about having this purely syntactical restriction lifted and following up with all the work that that entails...
What are Aggregates and PODs and how/why are they special? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4178175/what-are-aggregates-and-pods-and-how-why-are-they-special special about aggregates let's try to understand the restrictions on classes that is why they are there. We should understand.. be insufficient. You could figure out the rest of the restrictions in a similar manner as an exercise So enough about the aggregates... yet in scope to a point where it is already in scope. This restriction applies only if the variable is of non POD type. In the following..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4421706/operator-overloading binary infix operators for which the syntax specifies no restriction on whether they should be members or non members. Since they..
Using local classes with STL algorithms http://stackoverflow.com/questions/742607/using-local-classes-with-stl-algorithms even error Does anyone know where in the standard is the restriction What is the rationale for disallowing local types EDIT Since.. forbidden by the C 98 03 standard. C 11 remove that restriction. To be more complete The restrictions on types that are used.. C 11 remove that restriction. To be more complete The restrictions on types that are used as template parameters are listed in..
Can standard container templates be instantiated with incomplete types? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8329826/can-standard-container-templates-be-instantiated-with-incomplete-types C std vector C x ... However in my understanding this restriction is just for expanding the freedom of the implementation of standard..
|