¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: rvalues

How to pass parameters correctly?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15600499/how-to-pass-parameters-correctly

lvalues are objects with a stable identity and with rvalues rvalues are for instance temporaries or objects you're about.. are objects with a stable identity and with rvalues rvalues are for instance temporaries or objects you're about to move.. copy when passing lvalues and in one moves when passing rvalues. If your function needs to store this object somewhere you could..

non-class rvalues always have cv-unqualified types

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2169932/non-class-rvalues-always-have-cv-unqualified-types

class rvalues always have cv unqualified types §3.10 section 9 says non class.. have cv unqualified types §3.10 section 9 says non class rvalues always have cv unqualified types . That made me wonder... int..

What is move semantics?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3106110/what-is-move-semantics

. The arguments in lines 2 and 3 are not lvalues but rvalues because the underlying string objects have no names so the client.. has no way to inspect them again at a later point in time. rvalues denote temporary objects which are destroyed at the next semicolon.. again it is okay to move from string objects denoted by rvalues. To summarize the copy constructor makes a deep copy because..

What are rvalues, lvalues, xvalues, glvalues, and prvalues?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3601602/what-are-rvalues-lvalues-xvalues-glvalues-and-prvalues

are rvalues lvalues xvalues glvalues and prvalues In C 03 an expression.. are rvalues lvalues xvalues glvalues and prvalues In C 03 an expression is either an rvalue or an lvalue . In.. or an xvalue . An rvalue so called historically because rvalues could appear on the right hand side of an assignment expression..

C++11 rvalues and move semantics confusion

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4986673/c11-rvalues-and-move-semantics-confusion

11 rvalues and move semantics confusion I'm trying to understand rvalues.. and move semantics confusion I'm trying to understand rvalues references and move semantics of C 11. What is the difference..

Operator Precedence vs Order of Evaluation

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5473107/operator-precedence-vs-order-of-evaluation

Hence the result of the expressions x y z would be there rvalues i.e. 10 1 and 2 respectively. Hence now we may interpret x y..

What does T&& (double ampersand) mean in C++11?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5481539/what-does-t-double-ampersand-mean-in-c11

resolution lvalues prefer binding to lvalue references and rvalues prefer binding to rvalue references . Hence why temporaries.. operator. rvalue references will implicitly bind to rvalues and to temporaries that are the result of an implicit conversion.. references are lvalues. Unnamed rvalue references are rvalues. This is important to understand why the std move call is necessary..

What is “rvalue reference for *this”?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8610571/what-is-rvalue-reference-for-this

linked to 'void test f ' void f2 test will only match rvalues linked to 'void test f ' Then the argument list containing an..

error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type ?˜int&??from an rvalue of type ?˜int??/a>

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8293426/error-invalid-initialization-of-non-const-reference-of-type-int-from-an-rval

C++03. Test for rvalue-vs-lvalue at compile-time, not just at runtime

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9084671/c03-test-for-rvalue-vs-lvalue-at-compile-time-not-just-at-runtime

or an rvalue. I found that via this StackOverflow question Rvalues in C 03 Here's a demo of this working at run time This is a..