¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: wordinghttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/10639053/name-lookups-in-c-templates T make it dependent on the template argument. In my own wording shouldn't the compiler gcc 4.7 be able to figure out that the..
Aliasing `T*` with `char*` is allowed. Is it also allowed the other way around? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12612488/aliasing-t-with-char-is-allowed-is-it-also-allowed-the-other-way-around
C++ concat two `const char` string literals http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13292237/c-concat-two-const-char-string-literals define constant initialization and 6.7.4 for some more wording with respect to block level static duration variables. Neither..
Does initialization entail lvalue-to-rvalue conversion? Is `int x = x;` UB? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14935722/does-initialization-entail-lvalue-to-rvalue-conversion-is-int-x-x-ub with an indeterminate value . In particular the proposed wording for Paragraph 4.1 says When an lvalue to rvalue conversion occurs..
Why does an overridden function in the derived class hide other overloads of the base class? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1628768/why-does-an-overridden-function-in-the-derived-class-hide-other-overloads-of-the overriding share improve this question Judging by the wording of your question you used the word hide you already know what..
C++ Static member initalization (template fun inside) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1819131/c-static-member-initalization-template-fun-inside different to normal declarations. In fact C 0x changed its wording of 3.6.2 to the following Dynamic initialization of a non local..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1989552/gcc-error-with-variadic-templates-sorry-unimplemented-cannot-expand-identi this error and code that does not have the error. The wording of the error message seems to imply that the code should work..
non-class rvalues always have cv-unqualified types http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2169932/non-class-rvalues-always-have-cv-unqualified-types a post on comp.std.c noting the problem and suggesting new wording for the relevant piece of the standard. Unfortunately being..
May I take the address of the one-past-the-end element of an array? [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3144904/may-i-take-the-address-of-the-one-past-the-end-element-of-an-array at least some committee members e.g. Tom Plum thought the wording had been changed so it would not cause undefined behavior. OTOH..
Is 'volatile' needed in this multi-threaded C++ code? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3612505/is-volatile-needed-in-this-multi-threaded-c-code no pun intended than sorry. EDIT A minor mistake in my wording made the question appear as if I was asking if volatile is enough..
Function signature-like expressions as C++ template arguments http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4642079/function-signature-like-expressions-as-c-template-arguments different numbers of arguments I don't know the exactly wording in the spec that prohibits it but it has something to do with..
Does C++ support compile-time counters? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6166337/does-c-support-compile-time-counters by a bug in older versions of GCC and a little unclear wording in the Standard to believe that all those features were possible...
Compilers and argument order of evaluation in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/621542/compilers-and-argument-order-of-evaluation-in-c one over the other and leaves it as unspecified . Note the wording. It does not say this is undefined. Unspecified in this sense..
Downcasting using the Static_cast in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6322949/downcasting-using-the-static-cast-in-c in section 5.2.9 expr.static.cast of the C standard C 0x wording A prvalue of type pointer to cv1 B where B is a class type can..
order of evaluation of operands http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7112282/order-of-evaluation-of-operands . ... These haven't been changed for C 11. However the wording changes in the second one to say that the order is unsequenced..
Well, how does the custom deleter of std::unique_ptr work? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8274451/well-how-does-the-custom-deleter-of-stdunique-ptr-work Base p unique_ptr Derived new Derived . Possibly with some wording from the standard to back up the example i.e. that with whatever.. also how that works for upcasts and possibly with some wording from the standard . That turned out to be so simple to answer..
Can standard container templates be instantiated with incomplete types? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8329826/can-standard-container-templates-be-instantiated-with-incomplete-types type share improve this question Personally I feel the wording instantiating in 17.6.4.8 2 is a little ambiguous but according..
Does C++ support Variable Length Arrays? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8593643/does-c-support-variable-length-arrays too c c 11 share improve this question That leeway wording doesnt mean that any and everything in c99 is in c 11. What..
What is “rvalue reference for *this”? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8610571/what-is-rvalue-reference-for-this of this post. It's way easier to understand it with this wording though. Next the following code chooses the function to be called..
|