c++ Programming Glossary: argued

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/108768/needless-pointer-casts-in-c

will turn up more detailed explanations. edit It has been argued that TYPE p p TYPE malloc n sizeof TYPE makes it obvious when..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1115876/autocompletion-in-vim

a working autocompletion feature for the Vim editor. I've argued before that Vim completely replaces an IDE under Linux and while..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/154136/do-while-and-if-else-statements-in-c-c-macros

is erroneous. Of course it could and probably should be argued at this point that it would be better to declare BAR as an actual..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15865627/is-indexing-a-new-map-element-and-having-something-that-reads-it-assigned-to-it

assigns to element If word_count a does not exist it was argued that it would be assigned to twice without a sequencing in between...

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2995926/why-is-there-no-parameter-contra-variance-for-overriding

a not best match of the arguments. Of course it can be argued differently R f B should be the correct override and not R f..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3144904/may-i-take-the-address-of-the-one-past-the-end-element-of-an-array

For your array of 10 items array 10 would work. It's been argued a few times by the committee among others whether array 10 really..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32168/c-cast-syntax-styles

Since casts often reveal a weakness in the code it's argued that making casts visible in the code is a good thing. this..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4335024/grammar-of-a-c-translation-unit

any definition is also a declaration . Many people have argued with this statement but no one has ever given a counterexample...

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4970891/why-addresses-of-two-different-objects-should-be-different

Should the foo method be called on o1 or o2 It could be argued that since these objects have no data and no virtual methods..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5135734/whats-the-difference-in-gcc-between-std-gnu0x-and-std-c0x-and-which-one-s

this question So far as I can tell I think this could be argued an implementation bug or actually since C 0x isn't published..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5877726/how-to-allow-copy-elision-construction-for-c-classes-not-just-pod-c-structs

and as such it cannot elide that extra copy. It can be argued that if the function is inline then the compiler would have..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7596406/stdio-h-not-standard-in-c

both #include stdio.h and #include cstdio But someone argued that stdio.h is not actually C standard. is that true c stdio..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/838721/c-iterators-considered-harmful

question First to answer your questions No. In fact I argued elsewhere that iterators are the most important fundamental..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8627373/what-data-structure-exactly-are-deques-in-c

time as someone comments this seems challenging. Some have argued that we should not interpret this to mean non amortized constant..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8631531/what-does-constant-complexity-really-mean-time-count-of-copies-moves

time or something else On other threads some people have argued that time is totally irrelevant to what is required by the C..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/885908/while-1-vs-for-is-there-a-speed-difference

my use of while 1 in a Perl script that for is faster. I argued that they should be the same hoping that the interpreter would..