¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: subsequent

GCC C++ Linker errors: Undefined reference to 'vtable for XXX', Undefined reference to 'ClassName::ClassName()'

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1095298/gcc-c-linker-errors-undefined-reference-to-vtable-for-xxx-undefined-refere

to resolve currently oustanding dependencies. If a subsequent library then uses methods functions that were not originally..

Parse (split) a string in C++ using string delimiter (standard C++) [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14265581/parse-split-a-string-in-c-using-string-delimiter-standard-c

token you can remove it delimiter included to proceed with subsequent extractions if you want to preserve the original string just..

Why aren't my include guards preventing recursive inclusion and multiple symbol definitions?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14909997/why-arent-my-include-guards-preventing-recursive-inclusion-and-multiple-symbol

defined it will keep processing the following text. The subsequent directive #defines A_H defines the macro A_H . Then the preprocessor.. defined it will keep processing the following text. The subsequent directive #defines B_H defines the macro B_H . Then the directive..

What is “cache-friendly” code?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16699247/what-is-cache-friendly-code

accesses because the next few values which are needed for subsequent computations are already in a cache line . For simplicity assume..

How could pairing new[] with delete possibly lead to memory leak only?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1913343/how-could-pairing-new-with-delete-possibly-lead-to-memory-leak-only

the freeing of the size bytes then the destructors of the subsequent elements will never be called. This results in leaking resources.. called. This results in leaking resources allocated by the subsequent elements. Yet because I do free size bytes not sizeof T bytes..

How can I avoid including class implementation files?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2037880/how-can-i-avoid-including-class-implementation-files

not have an adverse affect. Include guards work by making subsequent #includes no ops with the definitions available from the first..

Why global and static variables are initialized to their default values?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2091499/why-global-and-static-variables-are-initialized-to-their-default-values

zero values. The garbage or uninitialized values that subsequent instances at the same stack level see are really the previous..

Purpose of Header guards

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2979384/purpose-of-header-guards

will included in the source code seen by the compiler. On subsequent #include 's the MARKER symbol will be defined and hence everything..

What can I use to profile C++ code in Linux?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/375913/what-can-i-use-to-profile-c-code-in-linux

will take a larger percentage and be easier to spot on subsequent passes. Caveat programmers tend to be skeptical of this technique..

Pure virtual functions may not have an inline definition. Why?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4174694/pure-virtual-functions-may-not-have-an-inline-definition-why

Come to think of it it seems such on second and subsequent glances But I believe the restriction wouldn't be there if there..

Undefined Behavior and Sequence Points

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4176328/undefined-behavior-and-sequence-points

evaluations shall be complete and no side effects of subsequent evaluations shall have taken place. §1.9 7 Side effects What..

Boost::Asio : io_service.run() vs poll() or how do I integrate boost::asio in mainloop

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4705411/boostasio-io-service-run-vs-poll-or-how-do-i-integrate-boostasio-in-ma

note that you will need to invoke io_service reset on any subsequent invocation to io_service run or io_service poll . share improve..

Why are C++ inline functions in the header

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5057021/why-are-c-inline-functions-in-the-header

App does not run with VS 2008 SP1 DLLs, previous version works with RTM versions

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/59635/app-does-not-run-with-vs-2008-sp1-dlls-previous-version-works-with-rtm-versions

so that they will use the SP1 DLLs in the redist folder or subsequent ones as new service packs come out . It took me hours to find..

C++ Header order

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/614302/c-header-order

in a header cpp file Obviously those that are required by subsequent headers should be earlier and class specific headers should..

Is local static variable initialization thread-safe in C++11?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8102125/is-local-static-variable-initialization-thread-safe-in-c11

So yes you're safe. This says nothing of course about the subsequent access to the variable through the reference. share improve..

I don't want my Excel Add-In to return an array (instead I need a UDF to change other cells)

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8520732/i-dont-want-my-excel-add-in-to-return-an-array-instead-i-need-a-udf-to-change

timer and how to pass information known only to the UDF to subsequent timer executed routines. The code below must be placed in a..

Why is strncpy insecure?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/869883/why-is-strncpy-insecure

attacker supplies an argv 1 of length ten or more. In the subsequent strncat data is copied not to buffer 10 as the code suggests..