c++ Programming Glossary: superior

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1282295/what-exactly-is-nullptr

another example beside the Wikipedia one where nullptr is superior to good old 0 c pointers c 11 nullptr share improve this..

Using Maven for C/C++ projects

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1541771/using-maven-for-c-c-projects

I highly recommend the maven nar plugin . I find it superior in many ways to the alternatives. It doesn't require listing..

Unnamed/anonymous namespaces vs. static functions

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/154469/unnamed-anonymous-namespaces-vs-static-functions

in a namespace scope the unnamed namespace provides a superior alternative. Static only applies to names of objects functions..

Garbage Collection in C++ — why?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/228620/garbage-collection-in-c-why

about GC. I tried both RAII and GC and I find RAII vastly superior. As said by Greg Rogers in his post Garbage Collection in C..

Experience using Boost.Log logging library? [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3510473/experience-using-boost-log-logging-library

the hierarchical logging system in log4j log4cxx was superior but Boost.Log has got me thinking otherwise. Filtering and attributes..

Why are unnamed namespaces used and what are their benefits?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/357404/why-are-unnamed-namespaces-used-and-what-are-their-benefits

manner is deprecated in C since unnamed namespaces are a superior alternative being able to even make a type translation unit..

What's the rationale for null terminated strings?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4418708/whats-the-rationale-for-null-terminated-strings

strings have been chosen instead of the obviously superior length prefixing EDIT Since some asked for facts and didn't..

Superiority of unnamed namespace over static?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4422507/superiority-of-unnamed-namespace-over-static

unnamed namespace over static How unnamed namespaces are superior to static keyword c namespaces share improve this question.. in a namespace scope the unnamed namespace provides a superior alternative. Unnamed namespace is superior to static keyword.. provides a superior alternative. Unnamed namespace is superior to static keyword primarily because the keyword static applies..

How do I use arrays in C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4810664/how-do-i-use-arrays-in-c

access individual elements of an array. Neither of them is superior to the other and you should familiarize yourself with both...

Why unnamed namespace is a“ superior” alternative to static? [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4977252/why-unnamed-namespace-is-a-superior-alternative-to-static

unnamed namespace is a&ldquo superior&rdquo alternative to static duplicate This question already.. in a namespace scope the unnamed namespace provides a superior alternative. I don't understand why unnamed namespace is superior.. alternative. I don't understand why unnamed namespace is superior alternative What is the rationale I knew it for a long time..

JIT compiler vs offline compilers

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/538056/jit-compiler-vs-offline-compilers

will there be breakthroughs that will make it infinitely superior to other compilers It looks like the multi core paradigm has..

Difference between try-catch syntax for function

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6756931/difference-between-try-catch-syntax-for-function

these syntax apart from coding style Is one of the syntax superior to other by any aspect c syntax try catch function try block..

Is there any real risk to deriving from the C++ STL containers?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/922248/is-there-any-real-risk-to-deriving-from-the-c-stl-containers

the same code so no pointless bloat. Both approaches are superior to using a raw container because if the implementation changes..

When are C++ macros beneficial?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/96196/when-are-c-macros-beneficial

functions consts and templates are usually a safer and superior alternative to a #define . The following macro #define SUCCEEDED.. macro #define SUCCEEDED hr HRESULT hr 0 is in no way superior to the type safe inline bool succeeded int hr return hr 0 But..