java Programming Glossary: arraydeque

AsyncTasks do not get collected causing other AsyncTasks to not run

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11705285/asynctasks-do-not-get-collected-causing-other-asynctasks-to-not-run

delegate the real work to THREAD_POOL_EXECUTOR but using ArrayDeque to control the submission of next tasks next task is submitted.. static class SerialExecutor implements Executor final ArrayDeque Runnable mTasks new ArrayDeque Runnable Runnable mActive public.. implements Executor final ArrayDeque Runnable mTasks new ArrayDeque Runnable Runnable mActive public synchronized void execute final..

Why is Java Vector class considered obsolete or deprecated?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1386275/why-is-java-vector-class-considered-obsolete-or-deprecated

Java equivalent of std::deque

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/350063/java-equivalent-of-stddeque

Is there a Java equivalent to this I found the Java 1.6 ArrayDeque class which has the insert removal and growable characteristics.. this question Primitive Collections for Java has an ArrayDeque with a get int idx method. http sourceforge.net projects pcj.. project though. An alternative would be to get the JDK ArrayDeque source and add the get int idx method yourself. Should be relatively..

What is the fastest Java collection with the basic functionality of a Queue?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6129805/what-is-the-fastest-java-collection-with-the-basic-functionality-of-a-queue

will have Objects inside him. Currently I'm using ArrayDeque because I see this is the faster Queue implementation. java.. performance collections share improve this question ArrayDeque is best. See this benchmark which comes from this blog post.. this blog post about the results of benchmarking this. ArrayDeque doesn't have the overhead of node allocations that LinkedList..

Why typical Array List implementations aren't double-ended?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6147618/why-typical-array-list-implementations-arent-double-ended

but entry #X in the list is always backing_array X . An ArrayDeque would be more complex besides having to keep track of the start..