¡@
2014/10/16 ¤W¤È 12:03:20
jquery Programming Glossary: fasterWhy is it a bad practice to return generated HTML instead of JSON? Or is it? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1284381/why-is-it-a-bad-practice-to-return-generated-html-instead-of-json-or-is-it How's it much more superior than HTML Is it very much faster Does it have a very much lesser load on the server On the other.. cause all you're getting is markup and no code. It will be faster to program in most cases cause you won't have to write code..
How to disable/enable an input with jQuery? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1414365/how-to-disable-enable-an-input-with-jquery rely on the actual DOM object and is probably a little faster than the other two options if you are only dealing with one..
jQuery: Why use document.ready if external JS at bottom of page? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1438883/jquery-why-use-document-ready-if-external-js-at-bottom-of-page everything works just the same but executes significantly faster ”almost a whole second faster on a pretty basic file Since the.. but executes significantly faster ”almost a whole second faster on a pretty basic file Since the document should be loaded at..
jQuery Mobile: document ready vs page events http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14468659/jquery-mobile-document-ready-vs-page-events tedious to hook and unhook events your code will be much faster without the .live method than with it. Instead of .live you.. Instead of .live you should use .on . .on is about 2 3x faster then .live . Take a look at this event binding benchmark http..
Microsoft CDN for jQuery or Google CDN? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1447184/microsoft-cdn-for-jquery-or-google-cdn or any javascript file for that matter. Is one potentially faster than the other What other factors could play a role in which..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/191881/serializing-to-json-in-jquery 5 specification and gracefully degrades if a native faster implementation exists. In fact I just landed a change in jQuery..
Why should I use Google's CDN for jQuery? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2180391/why-should-i-use-googles-cdn-for-jquery to host jQuery for my site Is it only because it loads faster this way jquery performance cdn share improve this question..
resize font to fit in a div (on one line) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3401136/resize-font-to-fit-in-a-div-on-one-line will be hidden from user's eyes and it will therefore work faster as well. BTW This is the usual way how auto growing textarea..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4204316/jquery-live-vs-delegate I also read somewhere that delegate is in some cases faster better performance . My question is is there a situation where..
Hide/Show Column in an HTML Table http://stackoverflow.com/questions/455958/hide-show-column-in-an-html-table table.hide2 .col2 display none ... This is going to be faster than any JS loop approach for really long tables it can make..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4579117/jquery-live-vs-delegate I also read somewhere that delegate is in some cases faster better performance . My question is is there a situation where..
Where do you include the jQuery library from? Google JSAPI? CDN? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/547384/where-do-you-include-the-jquery-library-from-google-jsapi-cdn of my single server location Closer servers usually means faster response times for the visitor. Second Many people choose to.. in their local cache. Pre cached content usually means faster load times for the visitor. Third My web hosting company charges..
What is fastest children() or find() in jQuery? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/648004/what-is-fastest-children-or-find-in-jquery the entire DOM below the node so children should be faster given equivalent implementations. However find uses native browser..
JQuery selector value escaping http://stackoverflow.com/questions/739695/jquery-selector-value-escaping p do something with option This is many times simpler and faster than asking jQuery to laboriously parse and implement your selector..
Why is it a bad practice to return generated HTML instead of JSON? Or is it? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1284381/why-is-it-a-bad-practice-to-return-generated-html-instead-of-json-or-is-it are trying to get me to use JSON instead of generated HTML. How's it much more superior than HTML Is it very much faster Does it have a very much lesser load on the server On the other side I have some reasons for using generated HTML. It's.. or actually more compact than JSON. It's less error prone cause all you're getting is markup and no code. It will be faster to program in most cases cause you won't have to write code separately for the client end. Which side are you on and why..
How to disable/enable an input with jQuery? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1414365/how-to-disable-enable-an-input-with-jquery .removeAttr 'disabled' In any version of jQuery You can always rely on the actual DOM object and is probably a little faster than the other two options if you are only dealing with one element assuming an event handler thus 'this' this.disabled..
jQuery: Why use document.ready if external JS at bottom of page? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1438883/jquery-why-use-document-ready-if-external-js-at-bottom-of-page I remove the ready function and call the methods straight up everything works just the same but executes significantly faster ”almost a whole second faster on a pretty basic file Since the document should be loaded at this point as all the markup.. call the methods straight up everything works just the same but executes significantly faster ”almost a whole second faster on a pretty basic file Since the document should be loaded at this point as all the markup comes before the script tags..
jQuery Mobile: document ready vs page events http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14468659/jquery-mobile-document-ready-vs-page-events recommend its use and neither do I. Even though it can be tedious to hook and unhook events your code will be much faster without the .live method than with it. Instead of .live you should use .on . .on is about 2 3x faster then .live . Take.. will be much faster without the .live method than with it. Instead of .live you should use .on . .on is about 2 3x faster then .live . Take a look at this event binding benchmark http jsperf.com jquery live vs delegate vs on 34 everything will..
Microsoft CDN for jQuery or Google CDN? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1447184/microsoft-cdn-for-jquery-or-google-cdn matter which CDN you use to link to your jquery file or any javascript file for that matter. Is one potentially faster than the other What other factors could play a role in which cdn you decide to use I know that Microsoft Yahoo and Google..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/191881/serializing-to-json-in-jquery Crockford's json2.js. It is fully compatible with the ECMAScript 5 specification and gracefully degrades if a native faster implementation exists. In fact I just landed a change in jQuery yesterday that utilizes the JSON.parse method if it exists..
Why should I use Google's CDN for jQuery? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2180391/why-should-i-use-googles-cdn-for-jquery but I've been wondering why should I depend on Google's server to host jQuery for my site Is it only because it loads faster this way jquery performance cdn share improve this question This is because It increases the parallelism available...
resize font to fit in a div (on one line) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3401136/resize-font-to-fit-in-a-div-on-one-line font size to your original title. This way this checking will be hidden from user's eyes and it will therefore work faster as well. BTW This is the usual way how auto growing textarea scripts work. They use dummy divs with same style settings..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4204316/jquery-live-vs-delegate between live and delegate is that live cannot be used in a chain. I also read somewhere that delegate is in some cases faster better performance . My question is is there a situation where you should use live instead of delegate UPDATE I've set up..
Hide/Show Column in an HTML Table http://stackoverflow.com/questions/455958/hide-show-column-in-an-html-table assuming style rules like table.hide1 .col1 display none table.hide2 .col2 display none ... This is going to be faster than any JS loop approach for really long tables it can make a significant difference to responsiveness. If you can get..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4579117/jquery-live-vs-delegate between live and delegate is that live cannot be used in a chain. I also read somewhere that delegate is in some cases faster better performance . My question is is there a situation where you should use live instead of delegate UPDATE I've set up..
Where do you include the jQuery library from? Google JSAPI? CDN? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/547384/where-do-you-include-the-jquery-library-from-google-jsapi-cdn Google api servers are distributed across the world instead of my single server location Closer servers usually means faster response times for the visitor. Second Many people choose to have JQuery hosted on Google so when a visitor comes to my.. comes to my site they may already have the JQuery script in their local cache. Pre cached content usually means faster load times for the visitor. Third My web hosting company charges me for the bandwidth used. No sense consuming 18k per user..
What is fastest children() or find() in jQuery? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/648004/what-is-fastest-children-or-find-in-jquery looks at the immediate children of the node while find traverses the entire DOM below the node so children should be faster given equivalent implementations. However find uses native browser methods while children uses JavaScript interpreted in..
JQuery selector value escaping http://stackoverflow.com/questions/739695/jquery-selector-value-escaping i select.options.length i 0 if select.options i .value a'b p do something with option This is many times simpler and faster than asking jQuery to laboriously parse and implement your selector and you can use any value string you like without having..
|