¡@
2014/10/16 ¤W¤È 12:05:46
jquery Programming Glossary: nextallHiding Next Visible Siblings Via If Statement Not Working http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15608072/hiding-next-visible-siblings-via-if-statement-not-working jquery share improve this question Try using nextAll to parent tr and you probably do not need to use each over here..
jQuery to find all previous elements that match an expression http://stackoverflow.com/questions/322912/jquery-to-find-all-previous-elements-that-match-an-expression elements all the way up the DOM tree similarly for nextAll and nextALL . I'll try to explain it in the comments below this..
Efficient, concise way to find next matching sibling? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4933236/efficient-concise-way-to-find-next-matching-sibling an element that matches a given selector other than using nextAll with the first pseudo class When I say official API I mean not.. the selector div.foo I can do this var nextFoo this .nextAll div.foo first ...and it works if I start with Five for instance.. match match.next return match ...is markedly slower than nextAll selector first . And that's not surprising nextAll can hand..
Cleanest way to get a sibling in jQuery http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6237673/cleanest-way-to-get-a-sibling-in-jquery I click 'form input checkbox' .click function alert this .nextAll 'a' .attr href form div input type checkbox name checkThis.. fastest solution but it makes the br elements mandatory. nextAll a but that can return multiple elements and will do so with.. markup sample . Chaining into first would prevent it but nextAll still would have to iterate over all the next siblings which..
Hiding Next Visible Siblings Via If Statement Not Working http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15608072/hiding-next-visible-siblings-via-if-statement-not-working parent rather than the next of all visible table rows. javascript jquery share improve this question Try using nextAll to parent tr and you probably do not need to use each over here to hide all next tr having td with class time . Live Demo..
jQuery to find all previous elements that match an expression http://stackoverflow.com/questions/322912/jquery-to-find-all-previous-elements-that-match-an-expression prevAll matches previous siblings prevALL matches ALL previous elements all the way up the DOM tree similarly for nextAll and nextALL . I'll try to explain it in the comments below this is a small helper extension i stole from http www.texotela.co.uk..
Efficient, concise way to find next matching sibling? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4933236/efficient-concise-way-to-find-next-matching-sibling but not less efficient way of finding the next sibling of an element that matches a given selector other than using nextAll with the first pseudo class When I say official API I mean not hacking internals going straight to Sizzle adding a plug.. whatever and want to find the next sibling div that matches the selector div.foo I can do this var nextFoo this .nextAll div.foo first ...and it works if I start with Five for instance it skips Six and Seven and finds Eight for me but it's clunky.. match match this.next while match.length 0 match.is selector match match.next return match ...is markedly slower than nextAll selector first . And that's not surprising nextAll can hand the whole thing off to Sizzle and Sizzle has been thoroughly..
Cleanest way to get a sibling in jQuery http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6237673/cleanest-way-to-get-a-sibling-in-jquery ways to get at the href of the link after the checkbox I click 'form input checkbox' .click function alert this .nextAll 'a' .attr href form div input type checkbox name checkThis value http www.google.com Check here br a href http www.google.com.. can write next .next as Arend suggests. That's probably the fastest solution but it makes the br elements mandatory. nextAll a but that can return multiple elements and will do so with your markup sample . Chaining into first would prevent it but.. that can return multiple elements and will do so with your markup sample . Chaining into first would prevent it but nextAll still would have to iterate over all the next siblings which can make it slow depending on the complexity of the markup..
|
