¡@
python Programming Glossary: b'sHow to properly eliminate elements in dictionary until one string remains http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13569105/how-to-properly-eliminate-elements-in-dictionary-until-one-string-remains until I get one winner in the end. So in this case all the B's will be eliminated in the dict itself not in the output. for..
Appending two CSV files column-wise http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19948526/appending-two-csv-files-column-wise import izip a 'abcdef' # File A's rows b 'ghijkl' # File B's rows outname 'joined' try os.unlink outname os.mkfifo outname..
How is __eq__ handled in Python and in what order? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3588776/how-is-eq-handled-in-python-and-in-what-order . Since int's don't know how to compare themselves to B's Python tries invoking B.__eq__ to see if it knows how to compare..
Python - why use “self” in a class? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/475871/python-why-use-self-in-a-class
Is there a way to set metaclass after the class definition? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5120688/is-there-a-way-to-set-metaclass-after-the-class-definition for you. Both solutions have the slight shortcoming that B's bases would be limited they need to be compatible with both..
How does Python's “super” do the right thing? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/607186/how-does-pythons-super-do-the-right-thing A init However if you comment out the call to super in B's init function neither A nor C's init function is called. This.. neither A nor C's init function is called. This means B's call to super is somehow aware of C's existence in the overall.. the existence of C to the object returned by super in B's init definition Is the information that subsequent calls of..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8658043/how-to-mock-an-import . You still have to create a mock_B.py where you mock B's actual functions variables etc. Or you can just assign a Mock..
Chain-calling parent constructors in python http://stackoverflow.com/questions/904036/chain-calling-parent-constructors-in-python work if you put it in the constructor for C fair enough B's constructor gets called. If you do the same in B self still.. still points to an instance of C so you end up calling B's constructor again this ends in an infinite recursion . There..
Python: Calling parent class __init__ with multiple inheritance, what's the right way? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9575409/python-calling-parent-class-init-with-multiple-inheritance-whats-the-righ B leaving A entering B leaving B leaving c Note that B's init gets called twice. If I do class A object def __init__.. I get entering c entering A leaving A leaving c Note that B's init never gets called. So it seems that unless I know control.. invokes A's code which will also call super which invokes B's code. See http rhettinger.wordpress.com 2011 05 26 super considered..
|