¡@
python Programming Glossary: b.__init__http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1984104/how-to-avoid-explicit-self hard are they to read and realize that members are used B.__init__ B_init B.__str__ B_str print B # The answer is 42. Remember..
Python super method and calling alternatives http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5033903/python-super-method-and-calling-alternatives self .__init__ class B A def __init__ self print 'Running B.__init__' # super B self .__init__ A.__init__ self class C A def __init__.. A B C D Running the code yields Running D.__init__ Running B.__init__ Running A.__init__ That's bad because C 's __init__ is skipped... the more desireable result Running D.__init__ Running B.__init__ Running C.__init__ Running A.__init__ Now all the __init__ methods..
Why is super() broken in Python-2.x? [closed] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5066315/why-is-super-broken-in-python-2-x value class BLogged B Logger def __init__ self i j B.__init__ self i j Logger.__init__ B def info self return 42 Here things..
Python: Calling parent class __init__ with multiple inheritance, what's the right way? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9575409/python-calling-parent-class-init-with-multiple-inheritance-whats-the-righ the right code to write here to ensure # A.__init__ and B.__init__ get called There's two typical approaches to writing C's __init__.. C A B def __init__ self print entering c A.__init__ self B.__init__ self print leaving c Then I get entering c entering A entering.. call approach C.__init__ can call both A.__init__ and B.__init__ . When using super the classes need to be designed for cooperative..
|