¡@

Home 

c# Programming Glossary: recipe

Entity Framework code first many-to-many mapping table

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11382783/entity-framework-code-first-many-to-many-mapping-table

classes EF would create a mapping table such as MembersRecipes and the primary key from each class would link to this table... when I do the below I instead get a new field in the Recipes table called Member_Id and a Recipe_Id in the Members table... a new field in the Recipes table called Member_Id and a Recipe_Id in the Members table. Which only creates two one to many..

What would I lose by abandoning the standard EventHandler pattern in .NET?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1120506/what-would-i-lose-by-abandoning-the-standard-eventhandler-pattern-in-net

there's the first argument sender . It seems to me like a recipe for unholy coupling. An event firing is essentially a function..

Reading dll.config (not app.config!) from a plugin module

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1208793/reading-dll-config-not-app-config-from-a-plugin-module

my head around the whole .NET Settings mess. I'd like a recipe to finish this task. I would also like a link to a clear explanation..

Cannot access non-static field

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1430787/cannot-access-non-static-field

in an inconsistent partially initialized state. That is a recipe for crazy bugs. We therefore restrict you from accessing this..

Read Introduction in C# - how to protect against it?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14799876/read-introduction-in-c-sharp-how-to-protect-against-it

believes the opposite and you're running Bar . This is a recipe for disaster. So what's the best practice here First do not..

Create a Deep Copy in C#

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3647048/create-a-deep-copy-in-c-sharp

Saving a Class to disk on dispose: Does my code have bugs?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3832911/saving-a-class-to-disk-on-dispose-does-my-code-have-bugs

correctly and doing this sort of work in one is just a recipe for disaster. Not to mention it'll kill performance and be impossible..

Why can't I use the 'await' operator within the body of a lock statement?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7612602/why-cant-i-use-the-await-operator-within-the-body-of-a-lock-statement

why we made it illegal. Awaiting inside a lock is a recipe for producing deadlocks. I'm sure you can see why arbitrary..

Is this object-lifetime-extending-closure a C# compiler bug?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8419079/is-this-object-lifetime-extending-closure-a-c-sharp-compiler-bug

the object This makes me anxious because this looks like a recipe for closure happy programmers like me to unwittingly introduce..