¡@
c# Programming Glossary: specGetting ServiceStack to retain type information http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10750571/getting-servicestack-to-retain-type-information type to deserialize into so it has to emit serialization specific implementation hints that now embeds C# concerns on the.. As there is no concept of 'type info' in the JSON spec in order for inheritance to work in JSON Serializers they need.. this type info which now couples your JSON payload to a specific JSON serializer implementation. ServiceStack's JsonSerializer..
Performance difference for control structures 'for' and 'foreach' in C# http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1124753/performance-difference-for-control-structures-for-and-foreach-in-c-sharp
Does using “new” on a strict allocate it on the heap or stack? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/203695/does-using-new-on-a-strict-allocate-it-on-the-heap-or-stack of this is just with the current implementation. The C# spec doesn't specify much of this it's effectively an implementation.. just with the current implementation. The C# spec doesn't specify much of this it's effectively an implementation detail. There.. live on the heap which would still conform with the spec. There are two different situations with the new operator on..
Compiler Ambiguous invocation error - anonymous method and method group with Func<> or Action http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2057146/compiler-ambiguous-invocation-error-anonymous-method-and-method-group-with-fun is correct. This is one of the hairiest parts of the spec so good on Jon for diving into it head first. Second let me.. that out of the way we can walk through section 6.6 of the spec and see what we get. To do overload resolution we need to first.. list of D. OK. So we do overload resolution on X with respect to D1. The formal parameter list of D1 is empty so we do overload..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/271440/c-sharp-captured-variable-in-loop how it reads out loud See section 7.14.4.2 of the C# 3.0 spec for more details of this and my article on closures has more..
Access to Modified Closure (2) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/304258/access-to-modified-closure-2 note that from C# 5 onwards this has changed and specifically in the case of foreach you do not need to do this any.. shows Wilma four times. This is because the language spec ECMA 334 v4 15.8.4 before C# 5 defines foreach V v in x embedded.. variable v is scoped inside the loop. I don't have a specification reference but it basically becomes E e C x .GetEnumerator..
Why can't I define a default constructor for a struct in .NET? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/333829/why-cant-i-define-a-default-constructor-for-a-struct-in-net According to this post this is mandated by the CLI spec. What happes is that for every value type a default constructor.. constructor. See this SO question for a bit more on that aspect. I suspect that there aren't any value types in the framework.. See this SO question for a bit more on that aspect. I suspect that there aren't any value types in the framework with parameterless..
Why are C# 3.0 object initializer constructor parentheses optional? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3661025/why-are-c-sharp-3-0-object-initializer-constructor-parentheses-optional sugary features. Some points we considered the design and specification cost was low we were going to be extensively changing.. them now become large Complicated rules have large design spec development testing and documentation costs. Complicated rules.. corner cases just waiting to yell gotcha at some poor unsuspecting soul who runs into it. Features like that get cut immediately..
OAuth 2.0 Service Provider .NET libraries http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3997172/oauth-2-0-service-provider-net-libraries solutions for .NET I appreciate that 2.0 isn't a complete spec . What libraries are people currently aware of other than DotNetOpenAuth..
Can a C# thread really cache a value and ignore changes to that value on other threads? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/458173/can-a-c-sharp-thread-really-cache-a-value-and-ignore-changes-to-that-value-on-ot is it might work but it isn't guaranteed to work by the spec. What people are usually after is code that works for the right..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/757684/enum-inheritance inherit from System.enum. See section 8.5.2 of the CLI spec for the full details. Relevant information from the spec All.. spec for the full details. Relevant information from the spec All enums must derive from System.Enum Because of the above..
How can I ensure that a division of integers is always rounded up? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/921180/how-can-i-ensure-that-a-division-of-integers-is-always-rounded-up engineering principles in doing so. Start by reading the specification for what you're trying to replace. The specification.. the specification for what you're trying to replace. The specification for integer division clearly states The division rounds.. result always upwards not always towards zero . So write a specification for that function. Our function int DivRoundUp int..
Is accessing a variable in C# an atomic operation? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9666/is-accessing-a-variable-in-c-sharp-an-atomic-operation this question For the definitive answer go to the spec. Partition I Section 12.6.6 of the CLI spec states A conforming.. go to the spec. Partition I Section 12.6.6 of the CLI spec states A conforming CLI shall guarantee that read and write..
|