¡@
c# Programming Glossary: synchronizationHow to wait for a BackgroundWorker to cancel? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/123661/how-to-wait-for-a-backgroundworker-to-cancel . i would hope to use some solution involving Event synchronization objects where the code waits for an event that the worker's..
Is there a way to indefinitely pause a thread? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/142826/is-there-a-way-to-indefinitely-pause-a-thread use by debuggers. It is not intended to be used for thread synchronization. Calling SuspendThread on a thread that owns a synchronization.. Calling SuspendThread on a thread that owns a synchronization object such as a mutex or critical section can lead to a deadlock.. lead to a deadlock if the calling thread tries to obtain a synchronization object owned by a suspended thread. To avoid this situation..
What's the best way of implementing a thread-safe Dictionary? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/157933/whats-the-best-way-of-implementing-a-thread-safe-dictionary not thread safe. That can be one reason for exposing a synchronization object outside your class. Another way to approach that would.. dictionary that would result in a deadlock . Exposing the synchronization object allows the consumer to make those decisions and doesn't..
How do C# Events work behind the scenes? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/213638/how-do-c-sharp-events-work-behind-the-scenes that calls the remove. For field like events there's some synchronization but otherwise the add remove just call Delegate. Combine Remove..
What are the differences between various threading synchronization options in C#? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/301160/what-are-the-differences-between-various-threading-synchronization-options-in-c are the differences between various threading synchronization options in C# Can someone explain the difference between lock.. Using Mutex Using Semaphore Using Monitor Using Other .Net synchronization classes I just can't figure it out. It seems to me the first.. seems to me the first two are the same c# multithreading synchronization locking mutex share improve this question Great question...
Lock (Monitor) internal implementation in .NET http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5111779/lock-monitor-internal-implementation-in-net multithreading programming it will be good to know about synchronization primitives. Here is the question how implemented Lock Monitor.. concerning 'violated queue'. c# .net multithreading synchronization monitor share improve this question The Wikipedia article.. a CV cannot easily be built from the existing Win32 synchronization primitives . Instead of just building a shallow and incorrect..
Creating a blocking Queue<T> in .NET? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/530211/creating-a-blocking-queuet-in-net improve this question That looks very unsafe very little synchronization how about something like class SizeQueue T private readonly..
C# version of java's synchronized keyword? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/541194/c-sharp-version-of-javas-synchronized-keyword dangerous code goes here. c# java multithreading synchronization share improve this question First most classes will never..
How to add a Timeout to Console.ReadLine()? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/57615/how-to-add-a-timeout-to-console-readline can't really ask the user for input at the same time so synchronization should be happening before making a call to Reader.ReadLine..
How to create a task (TPL) running a STA thread? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5971686/how-to-create-a-task-tpl-running-a-sta-thread Method to get a TaskScheduler for the current synchronization context which is the WPF dispatcher when you're running a WPF..
How to write a scalable Tcp/Ip based server http://stackoverflow.com/questions/869744/how-to-write-a-scalable-tcp-ip-based-server once at any point in time and we don't need to use thread synchronization. However if you reorder this to call the next receive immediately..
Is accessing a variable in C# an atomic operation? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9666/is-accessing-a-variable-in-c-sharp-an-atomic-operation from and writes to that variable must be protected by synchronization code such as a lock statement because the processor might switch..
|