c# Programming Glossary: violated

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1467568/debug-assert-vs-exception-throwing

your reasoning is plausible that is if an assertion is violated unexpectedly it makes sense to halt execution by throwing I..

Why is cross thread operation exception not thrown while running exe in bin\Debug

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3972727/why-is-cross-thread-operation-exception-not-thrown-while-running-exe-in-bin-debu

was necessary because there was lots of .NET 1.x code that violated this rule. It is not an obvious one. The bigger problem is that..

Monitor vs lock

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4978850/monitor-vs-lock

and the try . I think in debug code this condition was violated because the compiler inserted a NOP between them and thus made..

WPF MVVM Newbie - how should the ViewModel close the form?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/501886/wpf-mvvm-newbie-how-should-the-viewmodel-close-the-form

whole point of MVVM entirely... Update In the end I just violated the purity of the MVVM pattern and had the View publish a Closed..

Lock (Monitor) internal implementation in .NET

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5111779/lock-monitor-internal-implementation-in-net

cases threads queue that awaiting for the lock could be violated . Updated If more than one thread contends the lock they are.. CLR mean that the fairness of the queue can sometimes be violated. C# 4.0 in a Nutshell Joseph Albahari So this is what I'm asking.. this is what I'm asking about in last question concerning 'violated queue'. c# .net multithreading synchronization monitor share..

Does using public readonly fields for immutable structs work?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6063212/does-using-public-readonly-fields-for-immutable-structs-work

happens here that causes the debug assertions to be violated Sure. public void M ref Pair p int oldX this.x int oldY this.y.. myPair.M ref myPair And now what happens The assertion is violated this and p refer to the same storage location. The storage location..

Is it appropriate to extend Control to provide consistently safe Invoke/BeginInvoke functionality?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/714666/is-it-appropriate-to-extend-control-to-provide-consistently-safe-invoke-begininv

of my maintenance for an older application that badly violated the cross thread update rules in winforms I created the following..

Seeking clarification on apparent contradictions regarding weakly typed languages

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9929585/seeking-clarification-on-apparent-contradictions-regarding-weakly-typed-language

C# allows all three of those forms of strong typing to be violated. The cast operator violates static typing it says to the compiler..