¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: buried

Is there a production ready lock-free queue or hash implementation in C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1164023/is-there-a-production-ready-lock-free-queue-or-hash-implementation-in-c

using the Boost interprocess library. The boost code is buried in the depths of the interprocess library but having read through..

Precise floating-point<->string conversion

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1311242/precise-floating-point-string-conversion

such a conversion Or is such a conversion function already buried somewhere in the standard libraries boost. The reason for wanting..

Forcing a constant expression to be evaluated during compile-time?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14294271/forcing-a-constant-expression-to-be-evaluated-during-compile-time

share improve this question Just to not leave it buried in comments #include type_traits #define COMPILATION_EVAL e..

C/C++ function definitions without assembly

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2442966/c-c-function-definitions-without-assembly

inline assembly. That deep in the bowels of stdio.h is buried some asm code that actually tells CPU what to do. For example..

Dependency injection in C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/352885/dependency-injection-in-c

that was dealing with dependency injection but it got buried in the comments. I wonder how can the factory builder step of..

Isn't the template argument (the signature) of std::function part of its type?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5931214/isnt-the-template-argument-the-signature-of-stdfunction-part-of-its-type

you want to support but that is done once and then buried in a get_signature.h header. Another option I consider but immediatly..

Is the const value parameter in definition but not declaration really C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/768588/is-the-const-value-parameter-in-definition-but-not-declaration-really-c

ignored in this fashion const and volatile type specifiers buried within a parameter type specification are significant and can..

while (1) Vs. for (;;) Is there a speed difference?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/885908/while-1-vs-for-is-there-a-speed-difference

in with a response below. Quoted here in case it gets buried. It came from an AMD assembly programmer. He stated that C programmers..

C++03. Test for rvalue-vs-lvalue at compile-time, not just at runtime

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9084671/c03-test-for-rvalue-vs-lvalue-at-compile-time-not-just-at-runtime

with these conversion operators especially when they're buried inside the . I thought I might be able to use something like..