¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: ctorsAre members of a C++ struct initialized to 0 by default? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1069621/are-members-of-a-c-struct-initialized-to-0-by-default use these aggregate initializer lists if you've got constructors in your struct. If that is the case you will have to add proper.. you will have to add proper initalization to those constructors struct Snapshot int x double y Snapshot x 0 y 0 other ctors.. struct Snapshot int x double y Snapshot x 0 y 0 other ctors functions... Will initialize both x and y to 0. Note that you..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10730682/does-stdfunctions-copy-constructor-require-the-template-types-argument-types that the templated ctor is even looked at is that all ctors are enumerated before considering a best match in this case..
C++11 reentrant class locking strategy http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13240015/c11-reentrant-class-locking-strategy Private Implementation class Example Impl final public ctors obj boilerplate Impl Impl const std string init_foo ~Impl default..
C++ Constructor/Destructor inheritance http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14184341/c-constructor-destructor-inheritance B is a subclass of A. It's a matter of terminology ctors and dtors are not inherited in the sense that the ctor dtor.. one constructor and has exactly one destructor. Constructors B does not inherit constructors from A Unless B's ctor explicitely.. one destructor. Constructors B does not inherit constructors from A Unless B's ctor explicitely calls one of A's ctor the..
Under what circumstances are C++ destructors not going to be called? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3179494/under-what-circumstances-are-c-destructors-not-going-to-be-called what circumstances are C destructors not going to be called I know that my destructors are called.. C destructors not going to be called I know that my destructors are called on normal unwind of stack and when exceptions are.. exit is called. Are there any other cases where my destructors are not going to get called What about signals such as SIGINT..
Fast and flexible iterator for abstract class http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3960948/fast-and-flexible-iterator-for-abstract-class even compiled might not compile and will leak write destructors copy ctors op where you need to just to get you started on the.. might not compile and will leak write destructors copy ctors op where you need to just to get you started on the idea. template..
ADL with typedefs from another namespace http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4155450/adl-with-typedefs-from-another-namespace std pair int double 0 0.0 in 0x you can import the base's ctors with a using declaration If being used as a std pair isn't important..
What is the curiously recurring template pattern (CRTP)? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4173254/what-is-the-curiously-recurring-template-pattern-crtp class is quite simple have a static variable increment in ctors decrement in dtors . Try to do it as an excercise Yet another..
Naming convention for params of ctors and setters http://stackoverflow.com/questions/450866/naming-convention-for-params-of-ctors-and-setters convention for params of ctors and setters For those of you who name you member variables.. like m_foo or foo_ how do you name parameters to your ctors and setters Some options I've tried so far... Obj int foo foo..
Are value parameters implicitly moved when returned by value? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6009004/are-value-parameters-implicitly-moved-when-returned-by-value However the next paragraph explicitly brings move ctors back into consideration When the criteria for elision of a copy..
Is there a use for function declarations inside functions? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6089452/is-there-a-use-for-function-declarations-inside-functions this workaround doesn't work in the presence of explicit ctors Are the sole reasons because it makes the parser simpler and..
C++ macro/metaprogram to determine number of members at compile time http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6844605/c-macro-metaprogram-to-determine-number-of-members-at-compile-time accessors onto the tuple member. class message public ctors const int foo const return std get 0 data continue boiler plate..
Exporting classes containing std:: objects (vector, map, etc) from a dll http://stackoverflow.com/questions/767579/exporting-classes-containing-std-objects-vector-map-etc-from-a-dll classes from a DLL that contain objects such as std vectors and std stings the whole class is declared as dll export through.. taken to make sure no assignment operators copy constructors etc will get inlined into the dll client In general I'd like.. disable the warnings beware of compiler generated dtor ctors . Otherwise the members must export their methods. Forward declaring..
Why aren't copy constructors “chained” like default constructors or destructors? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8773048/why-arent-copy-constructors-chained-like-default-constructors-or-destructors aren't copy constructors &ldquo chained&rdquo like default constructors or destructors.. copy constructors &ldquo chained&rdquo like default constructors or destructors This might be a question with an obvious answer.. &ldquo chained&rdquo like default constructors or destructors This might be a question with an obvious answer or a duplicate...
Should I use std::move or std::forward in move ctors/assignment operators? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8860233/should-i-use-stdmove-or-stdforward-in-move-ctors-assignment-operators I use std move or std forward in move ctors assignment operators Unless I'm wrong it seems like either..
|