c++ Programming Glossary: f1

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/410593/pass-by-reference-value-in-c

value. That means that the following is pass by value void f1 Object const o f1 Object 1 void f2 int const i f2 42 2 void.. that the following is pass by value void f1 Object const o f1 Object 1 void f2 int const i f2 42 2 void f3 Object o f3 Object.. pass by reference by the rules of 8.5.3 4 and others void f1 Object op Object a Object op1 a f1 op1 1 void f2 Object const..

Pretty-print C++ STL containers

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4850473/pretty-print-c-stl-containers

below to generate some values struct fibonacci fibonacci f1 0 f2 1 int operator int r f1 f2 f1 f2 f2 r return f1 private.. struct fibonacci fibonacci f1 0 f2 1 int operator int r f1 f2 f1 f2 f2 r return f1 private int f1 int f2 int main std vector.. fibonacci fibonacci f1 0 f2 1 int operator int r f1 f2 f1 f2 f2 r return f1 private int f1 int f2 int main std vector..

What does T&& (double ampersand) mean in C++11?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5481539/what-does-t-double-ampersand-mean-in-c11

. The following code both invoke the move constructor for f1 and f2 foo f1 foo Move a temporary into f1 temporary becomes.. code both invoke the move constructor for f1 and f2 foo f1 foo Move a temporary into f1 temporary becomes empty foo f2.. constructor for f1 and f2 foo f1 foo Move a temporary into f1 temporary becomes empty foo f2 std move f1 Move f1 into f2 f1..

When to use forward declaration?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/553682/when-to-use-forward-declaration

or methods which accept return incomplete types void f1 X X f2 Define functions or methods which accept return pointers.. error Define functions or methods using this type void f1 X x compiler error X f2 compiler error Use its methods or fields..

What is “rvalue reference for *this”?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8610571/what-is-rvalue-reference-for-this

the overload set looks something like this void f1 test will only match lvalues linked to 'void test f ' void f2.. see how that looks like first call to 'f' in 'main' test t f1 t 't' lvalue can match 'test ' lvalue reference kept in overload.. for the second call to 'f' second call to 'f' in 'main' f1 test 'test ' not an lvalue can't match 'test ' lvalue reference..

“Manual” signature overload resolution

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14972954/manual-signature-overload-resolution

template class...Fs struct overloaded template class F1 class...Fs struct overloaded F1 Fs... F1 overloaded Fs... type.. overloaded template class F1 class...Fs struct overloaded F1 Fs... F1 overloaded Fs... type typedef overloaded type overloaded.. template class F1 class...Fs struct overloaded F1 Fs... F1 overloaded Fs... type typedef overloaded type overloaded F1..

Lambda functions as base classes

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18432260/lambda-functions-as-base-classes

that derives from 2 template parameters and has a using F1 operator clause. Now if I derive from two functors I can only.. derive from two functors I can only access the operator of F1 as I would expect If I derive from two Lambda Functions this.. int std cout Functor2 operator int n template typename F1 typename F2 struct Overload public F1 public F2 Overload F1..

Why is this ambiguity here?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3519282/why-is-this-ambiguity-here

the i th parameter of viable function F. A viable function F1 is defined to be a better function than another viable function.. another viable function F2 if for all arguments i ICSi F1 is not a worse conversion sequence than ICSi F2 and then ..... than ICSi F2 and then ... for some argument j ICSj F1 is a better conversion sequence than ICSj F2 or if not that..