¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: nessWhy are my struct's members not properly initialised using `{}`? [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14797810/why-are-my-structs-members-not-properly-initialised-using 1 or if you don't mind your struct potentially losing POD ness give T a constructor. Formal wording C 11 8.5.1 2 When an aggregate..
PHP and C++ for UTF-8 code unit in reverse order in Chinese character http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15972306/php-and-c-for-utf-8-code-unit-in-reverse-order-in-chinese-character They're both correct. The difference is in endian ness. My guess is that UTF 16 will output the string as little endian.. as little endian by default. You can enforce big endianness by using UTF 16BE instead. That or the exact reverse Note that..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1621574/mains-signature-in-c int to unsigned int as well as the non top level const ness of argv If I am then that's clearly prohibited. So are these..
Variable length arrays in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1887097/variable-length-arrays-in-c but they are treated specially so that the runtime ness doesn't escape the scope of the new operator . You can use std..
Do c++ templates make programs slow? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2442358/do-c-templates-make-programs-slow unless you've chosen to overload the function on const ness in which case you've probably done so specifically to provide..
Modifying a const through a non-const pointer http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2508605/modifying-a-const-through-a-non-const-pointer code const int e 2 int w int &e 1 cast to remove const ness w 5 2 cout << w << endl 3 outputs 5 cout << e.. is still the address of e c pointers casting const correctness share improve this question As I said in my comment once..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/357600/is-const-cast-safe Overflow is The const_cast is used to add remove const ness or volatile ness of a variable. This makes me nervous. Could.. const_cast is used to add remove const ness or volatile ness of a variable. This makes me nervous. Could using a const_cast..
C++ static member variable and its initialization http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4547660/c-static-member-variable-and-its-initialization also gives the sense of both static and global ness of the variable. For example if you see the static const member...
Should member functions be “const” if they affect logical state, but not bitwise state? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5208184/should-member-functions-be-const-if-they-affect-logical-state-but-not-bitwise I believe that const should reflect logical const ness regardless of the internal representation. Just because your..
What does T&& (double ampersand) mean in C++11? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5481539/what-does-t-double-ampersand-mean-in-c11 T new T std forward A1 a1 Now the argument's rvalue lvalue ness is preserved when passed to T's constructor. That means that..
Does const-correctness give the compiler more room for optimization? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6313730/does-const-correctness-give-the-compiler-more-room-for-optimization const correctness give the compiler more room for optimization I know that it.. but how so Thanks. c c pointers const const correctness share improve this question Edit OK so this question is.. foo takes a pointer to const it might cast the const ness away and modify the int. This is not undefined behavior. Here..
Why the Compiler does not detect correct function signature in error? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7111843/why-the-compiler-does-not-detect-correct-function-signature-in-error the syntax of the error message just as precise the lvalue ness of the argument is important or the rvalue ness would be important.. the lvalue ness of the argument is important or the rvalue ness would be important so that piece of information has to be present..
Does the evil cast get trumped by the evil compiler? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/712334/does-the-evil-cast-get-trumped-by-the-evil-compiler actually be located on the stack somewhere and the const ness can't be enforced so the memory at that location pTOCONST is.. is mutable after all. In short you casted away the const ness don't do that. Poor defenseless C... Addendum Using GCC for..
Virtual destructor and undefined behavior http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8599225/virtual-destructor-and-undefined-behavior ~D will certainly not get called irrespective of virtual ness of the destructor. Is it an undefined behavior or well defined..
C++03. Test for rvalue-vs-lvalue at compile-time, not just at runtime http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9084671/c03-test-for-rvalue-vs-lvalue-at-compile-time-not-just-at-runtime Now that I've spelled out the question testing rvalue ness in C 03 at compile time I'll talk a little about the things..
In C++ is “const” after type ID acceptable? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/988069/in-c-is-const-after-type-id-acceptable int const n A side note an easy way to read pointer const ness is to read the declaration starting at the right. const int..
|