ˇ@
c++ Programming Glossary: omitWhy Switch/Case and not If/Else If? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1028437/why-switch-case-and-not-if-else-if you need to execute common code for several cases you may omit break and the execution will fall through something you cannot..
Is returning by rvalue reference more efficient? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1116641/is-returning-by-rvalue-reference-more-efficient it will move construct the temporary into ab or do RVO to omit doing a move or copy altogether. I recommend you to read BoostCon09..
Use of 'const' for function parameters http://stackoverflow.com/questions/117293/use-of-const-for-function-parameters it's worthwhile I was also surprised to learn that you can omit const from parameters in a function declaration but can include..
Why doesn't a derived template class have access to a base template class' identifiers? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1239908/why-doesnt-a-derived-template-class-have-access-to-a-base-template-class-ident some T s that the compiler only sees later and you cannot omit the base class qualification from identifiers defined in the..
Multiple definition of inline functions when linking static libs http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2217628/multiple-definition-of-inline-functions-when-linking-static-libs definition. If used internal in a library they can do omit checking on function arguments that would otherwise be done..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/308279/c-strings-vs to be an array void accept_array char foo but you omit the size. Actually any size would do it as it is just ignored..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3540931/inline-functions-in-c the code for the inline function at each call site and omit emitting a callable function version. This is different from..
Returning unique_ptr from functions http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4316727/returning-unique-ptr-from-functions certain criteria are met an implementation is allowed to omit the copy move construction of a class object ... This elision..
“Proper” way to store binary data with C++/STL http://stackoverflow.com/questions/441203/proper-way-to-store-binary-data-with-c-stl much boil down to using strings or vector char s. I'll omit the possibility of char s and malloc s since I'm referring specifically..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4421706/operator-overloading If you provide also provide if you provide do not omit etc. Andrew Koenig is said to have been the first to observe.. data elements returned by operator in which case you can omit the non const variant you should always provide both variants..
Where and why do I have to put the “template” and “typename” keywords? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/610245/where-and-why-do-i-have-to-put-the-template-and-typename-keywords a declaration must be written as typename t x f . If you omit the keyword and the name is taken to be a non type but when..
C/C++ gcc & ld - remove unused symbols http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6687630/c-c-gcc-ld-remove-unused-symbols declared in it but one of them was unused you could omit the unused one with the following command to gcc g gcc Os fdata..
C++ Member Initialization List http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7665021/c-member-initialization-list cpp file Should I repeat m_size 5 m_top 1 or I can omit this steap Example Example int size int grow_by ... some code..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/809948/dll-references-in-visual-c in the list of directories. If you dont have a lib you can omit this but while your here you will also need to set the directory..
Can I declare variables of different types in the initialization of a for loop? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8644707/can-i-declare-variables-of-different-types-in-the-initialization-of-a-for-loop b d 0 0 d.a 10 d.a d.b Of course when all are 0 you can omit the initializers altogether and write . share improve this..
Isn't C++'s inline totally optional? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/908830/isnt-cs-inline-totally-optional inline on the declaration of f inside the class but then omit defining it in the header then you violate 3.2 3 and 7.1.2 4..
Move assignment operator and `if (this != &rhs)` http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9322174/move-assignment-operator-and-if-this-rhs example this will be perfectly harmless if we simply omit the assert or constrain it to the moved from case dumb_array..
When should I make explicit use of the `this` pointer? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/993352/when-should-i-make-explicit-use-of-the-this-pointer B A T int foo return this i int main B int b b.foo If you omit this the compiler does not know how to treat i since it may.. the this prefix is required. Note it is possible to still omit this prefix by using template class T struct B A T using A T..
|