c++ Programming Glossary: oversight

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11021764/does-moving-a-vector-invalidate-iterators

from the previous Standard. Perhaps it was simply an oversight of the Std comittee to not make a similar clarification for..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1361139/c-vector-of-pointers-to-objects

std make_unique is missing from the C 11 standard by oversight but you can make one yourself. To directly create a unique_ptr..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13923684/template-class-incomplete-specialization

made to avoid some problem I can't foresee Is it an oversight Thanks in advance. c template specialization share improve..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14823732/c-standard-wording-does-through-all-iterators-in-the-range-imply-sequential

the current wording imply sequentiality If not was this an oversight by the members of the committee or intentional I am well aware..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16605233/how-to-disable-buffering-on-a-stream

for output and not for input. I'm not sure if that was an oversight or whether that was intended. Consulting your compiler documentation..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2132273/what-does-malloc0-return

return NULL . I am not sure if the omission in C99 is an oversight or if it means that in C99 realloc ptr 0 for non NULL ptr is..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/294927/does-delete-work-with-pointers-to-base-class

to add the virtual destructor to IFoo it was a simple oversight. Thanks again to everyone who pointed it out. c boost polymorphism..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3829885/how-to-copy-a-certain-number-of-chars-from-a-file-to-a-vector-the-stl-way

was noted by Steve this would need copy_n which due to an oversight isn't in the current standard library but will be in C 1x. You..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5074122/stdistream-iterator-with-copy-n-and-friends

is a correct standard conforming behaviour. Is this an oversight in the standard What is the rationale for this behaviour From..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5101516/why-function-template-cannot-be-partially-specialized

AFAIK that's changed in C 0x. I guess it was just an oversight considering that you can always get the partial specialization..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5298421/why-doesnt-java-support-pass-by-reference-like-c

has not penalized Java for what you perceive as an oversight. Pass by value in C places burdens on both the developer e.g...

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7038357/make-unique-and-perfect-forwarding

blog That C 11 doesn 脌 include make_unique is partly an oversight and it will almost certainly be added in the future. He also..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7429510/non-pointer-typedef-of-member-functions-not-allowed

Demo for error . Why is this not allowed Is it simply an oversight or would it cause problems c compiler errors function pointers..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8697866/are-there-any-specific-reasons-to-use-non-virtual-destructors

when to use virtual destructors. So is it a C design oversight or am I missing something c language design virtual destructor..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8896/memcached-on-windows-x64

approach before I could be confident. One little oversight on my part could bring the site down. Oh well....till next time.....

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8947579/why-isnt-there-a-stdshared-ptrt-specialisation

256 double arr delete arr .............. Is this simply an oversight in the same way that there is an std copy_if or is there a reason..