¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: protectinghttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/1277627/overhead-of-pthread-mutexes as others have already pointed out there is no point in protecting a getter method for something like isActive with a mutex once..
using namespace std; in a header file http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14575799/using-namespace-std-in-a-header-file Yes I know in this example I am also to blame for not protecting my own classes in my own namespace but that's the one I came..
Why aren't my include guards preventing recursive inclusion and multiple symbol definitions? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14909997/why-arent-my-include-guards-preventing-recursive-inclusion-and-multiple-symbol include guards FIRST QUESTION Why aren't include guards protecting my header files from mutual recursive inclusion I keep getting.. this question FIRST QUESTION Why aren't include guards protecting my header files from mutual recursive inclusion They are . What.. multiple definitions They are . What they are not protecting you from is multiple definitions in separate translation units..
handling central data buffer for many processes in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1590773/handling-central-data-buffer-for-many-processes-in-c
When and how to use GCC's stack protection feature? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1629685/when-and-how-to-use-gccs-stack-protection-feature GCC emits some warnings when building the project not protecting function no buffer at least 8 bytes long not protecting local.. protecting function no buffer at least 8 bytes long not protecting local variables variable length buffer For the first warning..
C++0x memory model and speculative loads/stores http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2001913/c0x-memory-model-and-speculative-loads-stores might have elected to conditionally acquire the lock protecting x only if y 2. Hence the speculative store might introduce a..
In what situation do you use a semaphore over a mutex in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2350544/in-what-situation-do-you-use-a-semaphore-over-a-mutex-in-c from Boost.Thread instead. But semaphores aren't for protecting resources in the way mutexes are they're for sending a signal..
Using condition variable in a producer-consumer situation http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2379806/using-condition-variable-in-a-producer-consumer-situation the following global variables boost mutex mutexQ mutex protecting the queue boost mutex mutexCond mutex for the condition variable..
Reading from a text field in another application's window http://stackoverflow.com/questions/352236/reading-from-a-text-field-in-another-applications-window a text box window that happened to be lying around. As for protecting your own text boxes from being inspected like this you could..
Can someone Explain Mutex and how it is used? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3528877/can-someone-explain-mutex-and-how-it-is-used of your program running which is what your mutex is protecting against. Effectively it is still protecting against access from.. your mutex is protecting against. Effectively it is still protecting against access from more than one thread it's just that those..
A very simple thread pool using pthreads in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3561095/a-very-simple-thread-pool-using-pthreads-in-c input queue and an output queue and there will be mutexes protecting each. I've written some code that does just that but valgrind's..
Is this rule about volatile usage strict? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4168735/is-this-rule-about-volatile-usage-strict fact that it helps you it has nothing to do with actually protecting concurrent access to objects . The problem is only that 90 of..
how to make an application thread safe? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5125241/how-to-make-an-application-thread-safe you can synchronize access to the critical data properly protecting from thread unsafe modifications. Mutexes and Locks are very.. to the class so you can be more certain that you're protecting it properly . clean up globals. Globals are bad anyways and..
|