¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: redundantIs there any reason to use the 'auto' keyword in C / C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1046477/is-there-any-reason-to-use-the-auto-keyword-in-c-c the end of their block. Putting auto in front of them is redundant since that is the default anyway. I don't know of any reason.. by default. Note hence the auto specifier is almost always redundant and not often used one use of auto is to distinguish a declaration.. int or the declaration of a variable a of type int having redundant parentheses around a . It is always taken to be a declaration..
Passing shared pointers as arguments http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10826541/passing-shared-pointers-as-arguments in a member variable for example Won't that make a redundant copy The function can simply move the shared_ptr argument into.. by reference and make the copy if you need it. I risk one redundant copy in the first option and lose a potential move in the second...
Why are strings in C++ usually terminated with '\0'? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10943033/why-are-strings-in-c-usually-terminated-with-0 Hence you'll often see strncpy combined with the possibly redundant assignment of a null terminator. strlcpy and strcpy_s were designed..
Why are redundant scope qualifications supported by the compiler, and is it legal? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12135498/why-are-redundant-scope-qualifications-supported-by-the-compiler-and-is-it-lega are redundant scope qualifications supported by the compiler and is it legal.. question was not clear or too short I'm curious why redundant qualifications are permitted on the definition emphasis also..
Why aren't my include guards preventing recursive inclusion and multiple symbol definitions? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14909997/why-arent-my-include-guards-preventing-recursive-inclusion-and-multiple-symbol hope it will help filling the gap. If you find this entry redundant please accept my apologies for unintentionally introducing noise.. guards help you preventing recursive mutual inclusions and redundant inclusions of the same header in one translation unit they can't..
Copy constructor and = operator overload in C++: is a common function possible? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1734628/copy-constructor-and-operator-overload-in-c-is-a-common-function-possible and bases and even where it is valid it is semantically redundant and may be practically expensive. An increasingly popular solution..
Is !! a safe way to convert to bool in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/206106/is-a-safe-way-to-convert-to-bool-in-c are both implicitly converted to bool so and are IMO silly redundant decorations of the cast. I vote for b t 0 No implicit conversions...
Can I assume (bool)true == (int)1 for any C++ compiler? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2725044/can-i-assume-booltrue-int1-for-any-c-compiler boolean share improve this question Yes. The casts are redundant. In your expression true 1 Integral promotion applies and the..
C++: const reference, before vs after type-specifier http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3694630/c-const-reference-before-vs-after-type-specifier would mean the reference itself is immutable which is redundant when dealing with const pointers both Fred const and Fred const..
5 years later, is there something better than the “Fastest Possible C++ Delegates”? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4298408/5-years-later-is-there-something-better-than-the-fastest-possible-c-delegate that the syntax is absolutely horrible. The syntax appears redundant can't the compiler figure out the types from the pointer to..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4303513/push-back-vs-emplace-back Type _Val provided by MSCV10 is non conforming and redundant because as you noted it is strictly equivalent to push_back..
Why do all these crazy function pointer definitions all work? What is really going on? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6893285/why-do-all-these-crazy-function-pointer-definitions-all-work-what-is-really-goi an object. For pointers to ordinary functions it is always redundant because of the implicit function to function pointer conversion...
Boolean expression (grammar) parser in c++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8706356/boolean-expression-grammar-parser-in-c correct handling of the precedence rules by adding redundant parentheses result a b ^ c d a b result a b ^ c d a b result..
Image scaling (KeepAspectRatioByExpanding) through OpenGL http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9011108/image-scaling-keepaspectratiobyexpanding-through-opengl tex vec2 CbCrX CrY .x .5 float y texture2DRect tex t .x redundant texture read optimized away by texture cache float r y 1.28033..
|