¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: reimplementingCould multiple proxy classes make up a STL-proof bitvector? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14061694/could-multiple-proxy-classes-make-up-a-stl-proof-bitvector operator and access the template T's interface without reimplementing all the functionality. However for reference proxies you would..
What is the equivalent of the C++ Pair<L,R> in Java? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/156275/what-is-the-equivalent-of-the-c-pairl-r-in-java be the equivalent of this C construct I would rather avoid reimplementing my own. It seems that 1.6 is providing something similar AbstractMap.SimpleEntry..
Where to delete QTcpSocket in thread to avoid valgrind errors http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19280903/where-to-delete-qtcpsocket-in-thread-to-avoid-valgrind-errors this question Your problems stem almost entirely from reimplementing QThread . Don't do it. Put all of your functionality into a..
What is the optimal size of a UDP packet for maximum throughput? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/276058/what-is-the-optimal-size-of-a-udp-packet-for-maximum-throughput dealing with reordered packets and so on . If you start reimplementing all the TCP algorithms you risk ending up with an paraphasing..
Alternative to template declaration of typedef http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3708593/alternative-to-template-declaration-of-typedef it's not allowed but I need a quick and easy way without reimplementing all functions operators overloads etc. to get a template typedef...
Absence of typeof operator in C++03? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4533758/absence-of-typeof-operator-in-c03
Mac (or c++) connection to binary WCF http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6459619/mac-or-c-connection-to-binary-wcf to communicate with the service without enormous effort by reimplementing whole binary protocol and encoding. You should probably start..
Avoiding default construction of elements in standard containers http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7218574/avoiding-default-construction-of-elements-in-standard-containers in my case std vector . In other words I'd like to avoid reimplementing the entirety of std vector and instead provide a facade around..
Why doesn't emplace_back() use uniform initialization? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8782895/why-doesnt-emplace-back-use-uniform-initialization preempted by std initializer_list without essentially reimplementing push_back. std vector std vector int v v.emplace_back 3 4 v..
|