¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: removal

Why does std::stack use std::deque by default?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/102459/why-does-stdstack-use-stddeque-by-default

choice. priority_queue requires indexing heavily as every removal and insertion requires you to run pop_heap or push_heap . This..

C++ STL containers: what's the difference between deque and list?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1436020/c-stl-containers-whats-the-difference-between-deque-and-list

random access to elements constant time insertion and removal of elements at the end of the sequence and linear time insertion.. at the end of the sequence and linear time insertion and removal of elements in the middle. The main way in which deque differs.. is that deque also supports constant time insertion and removal of elements at the beginning of the sequence. Additionally deque..

Possible ambiguity with extern “C”, overloading, and function pointers

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15536488/possible-ambiguity-with-extern-c-overloading-and-function-pointers

C language linkage. GCC bug Finding reasons to ask for the removal of this feature from the next standard is kind of relevant .....

When can typeid return different type_info instances for same type?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1819114/when-can-typeid-return-different-type-info-instances-for-same-type

Do STL iterators guarantee validity after collection was changed?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3329956/do-stl-iterators-guarantee-validity-after-collection-was-changed

do not invalidate iterators to list elements and that even removal invalidates only the iterators that point to the elements that..

Can lambda functions be templated?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3575901/can-lambda-functions-be-templated

it all and stick to monomorphic lambdas. However with the removal of concepts from C 0x polymorphic lambdas become a simple proposition..

Optimizing away a “while(1);” in C++0x

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3592557/optimizing-away-a-while1-in-c0x

is intended to allow compiler transfor mations such as removal of empty loops even when termination cannot be proven. end note.. is intended to allow compiler transfor mations such as removal of empty loops even when termination cannot be proven. Presumably..

What can I use to profile C++ code in Linux?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/375913/what-can-i-use-to-profile-c-code-in-linux

The reason is that the time that would be saved by removal of an instruction is approximated by the fraction of samples..

How do I remove an item from a stl vector with a certain value?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/39912/how-do-i-remove-an-item-from-a-stl-vector-with-a-certain-value

there was no method on the vector class that allowed the removal of an element with a certain value. This seems like a common.. which can be passed to container_type erase to do the REAL removal of the extra elements that are now at the end of the container..

Detecting USB Insertion / Removal Events in Windows using C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4078909/detecting-usb-insertion-removal-events-in-windows-using-c

an existing application that needs to handle USB insertion removal events. I know the VID PID of the device of interest. However.. . What would be the best way to detect USB insertion removal events with C This sample code on the Microsoft website shows.. via WMI How could it be modified to receive USB insertion removal events Or is there another way I should be going about this..

std::vector versus std::array in C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4424579/stdvector-versus-stdarray-in-c

iteration over all the elements in linear time add and removal of elements at the end in constant amortized time etc but AFAIK..

Why was pair range access removed from C++11?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6167598/why-was-pair-range-access-removed-from-c11

removed. Does anyone know why it was removed I find the removal very unfortunate because it seems there is no other way to treat..