¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: segIs there a standalone implementation of std::function? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14739902/is-there-a-standalone-implementation-of-stdfunction . So I removed the code that threw the exception now it seg faults if an empty function is called and I saved myself 60k...
Swapping Nodes on a single linked list http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1535988/swapping-nodes-on-a-single-linked-list tmp EDIT2 This one doesn't seem to work either I get a seg fault. swap previous's next tmp firstPrev next secPrev next.. second next first next second next tmp If you're getting a segfault check the tmp variable it could be an error of allocation..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15431365/cudamemcpy-segmentation-fault segmentation fault I've been haunted by this error for quite a.. error for quite a while so I decided to post it here. This segmentation fault happened when a cudaMemcpy is called CurrentGrid.. cdata i to A and then cudaMemcpy A to host. So the segment of code written above becomes float A cudaMalloc void A..
May compiler optimizations be inhibited by multi-threading? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16807766/may-compiler-optimizations-be-inhibited-by-multi-threading fp mno red zone mno sse4 mpush args msahf mtls direct seg refs and running gcc Q v fopenmp some_file.c gives this relevant.. fp mno red zone mno sse4 mpush args msahf mtls direct seg refs Taking a diff we can see that the only difference is that..
Seg Fault when using std::string on an embedded Linux platform http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2412667/seg-fault-when-using-stdstring-on-an-embedded-linux-platform The program will run for a few seconds before giving a segmentation fault. The code is compiled using a arm linux cross.. int main int argc char argv TestSeg seg seg.RunTest pthread_exit NULL c linux string segmentation.. int main int argc char argv TestSeg seg seg.RunTest pthread_exit NULL c linux string segmentation fault..
Linking with multiple versions of a library http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3232822/linking-with-multiple-versions-of-a-library There are no errors at build time but at runtime the app seg faults. The reason seems to be that version X uses structures..
why doesn't my program crash when I write past the end of an array? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6452959/why-doesnt-my-program-crash-when-i-write-past-the-end-of-an-array I can even give upto 200 in a 64 bit machine. how would a segmentation fault in main function get detected in the OS void.. it and executing it a core dump is produced gcc ggdb3 segfault.c ulimit c unlimited . a.out Segmentation fault core dumped.. at s.c 8 8 q i i gdb p i 1 1008 gdb huh the program didn ™t segfault when one wrote outside the 200 items allocated instead..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/671703/array-index-out-of-bound-in-c stdio.h int main int a 10 a 3 4 a 11 3 does not give segmentation fault a 25 4 does not give segmentation fault a 20000.. 11 3 does not give segmentation fault a 25 4 does not give segmentation fault a 20000 3 gives segmentation fault return 0 I.. a 25 4 does not give segmentation fault a 20000 3 gives segmentation fault return 0 I understand that it's trying to access..
|