¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: sequencedIn which versions of the C++ standard does “(i+=10)+=10” have undefined behaviour? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10655290/in-which-versions-of-the-c-standard-does-i-10-10-have-undefined-behaviou points for the much clearer idea of sequence before and sequenced after . The language from C 98 is replaced with C 11 intro.execution.. and of subexpressions of individual expressions are unsequenced. ... If a side effect on a scalar object is unsequenced relative.. unsequenced. ... If a side effect on a scalar object is unsequenced relative to either another side effect on the same scalar object..
Initialize std::array with a range (pair of iterators) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10929202/initialize-stdarray-with-a-range-pair-of-iterators the computation of each element in a braced init list is sequenced before the computation of the next element §8.5.4 4 . internal..
Are multiple mutations within initializer lists undefined behavior? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14442894/are-multiple-mutations-within-initializer-lists-undefined-behavior in an initizalizer list are evaluated left to right and sequenced before the evaluation of the constructor of S . Therefore your.. side effect associated with a given initializer clause is sequenced before every value computation and side effect associated with.. and of subexpressions of individual expressions are unsequenced. ... When calling a function whether or not the function is..
Unsequenced value computations (a.k.a sequence points) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3852768/unsequenced-value-computations-a-k-a-sequence-points value computations a.k.a sequence points Sorry for opening.. effects. 1.9 15 If a side effect on a scalar object is unsequenced relative to either another side effect on the same scalar object.. associated with different argument expressions are unsequenced. ”end note 3.9 9 Arithmetic types 3.9.1 enumeration types pointer..
Is it legal to use the increment operator in a C++ function call? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/598148/is-it-legal-to-use-the-increment-operator-in-a-c-function-call the postfix expression designating the called function is sequenced before execution of every expression or statement in the body.. associated with the different argument expressions are unsequenced. So it would seem to me that this code foo i is perfectly legal... 1.9.16 also says If a side effect on a scalar object is unsequenced relative to either another side effect on the same scalar object..
function parameter evaluation order http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9566187/function-parameter-evaluation-order other function calls that is not otherwise specifically sequenced before or after the execution of the body of the called function.. of the body of the called function is indeterminately sequenced with respect to the execution of the called function. 94 .....
|