c++ Programming Glossary: syntactically

Is any part of C++ syntax context sensitive? [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1172939/is-any-part-of-c-syntax-context-sensitive

probably Turing complete since it shows a program which is syntactically correct if and only if a given integer is prime. So I assert.. control ambiguity and type rules must be used to weed out syntactically valid but meaningless constructs. Finally here's the promised.. Finally here's the promised program. Line 21 is syntactically correct if and only if the N in IsPrime N is prime. Otherwise..

What is an undefined reference/unresolved external symbol error and how do I fix it?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12573816/what-is-an-undefined-reference-unresolved-external-symbol-error-and-how-do-i-fix

is converted into a token. 2.7 . The resulting tokens are syntactically and semantically analyzed and translated as a translation unit...

Is C++ context-free or context-sensitive?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14589346/is-c-context-free-or-context-sensitive

Do-While and if-else statements in C/C++ macros

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/154136/do-while-and-if-else-statements-in-c-c-macros

expand into if corge f corge g corge else gralt which is syntactically incorrect as the else is no longer associated with the if. It.. braces within the macro because the following is also syntactically incorrect. if corge f corge g corge else gralt There are two.. bar BAR expands the above code into what follows which is syntactically correct. if corge f corge g corge else gralt This doesn't work..

Why doesn't ADL find function templates?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2953684/why-doesnt-adl-find-function-templates

of the call. If no such name is visible the call is not syntactically well formed and argument dependent lookup does not apply. If..

Use of typename keyword with template function parameters

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4347730/use-of-typename-keyword-with-template-function-parameters

Of course this semantically is all nonsense but it syntactically is alright. The appearance of a single const syntactically makes.. syntactically is alright. The appearance of a single const syntactically makes it unambiguous but it's too much context dependence to.. of a typename . That is totally nonsense too but is syntactically valid . In the case of base class names name lookup itself states..

Undefined Behavior and Sequence Points Reloaded

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4638364/undefined-behavior-and-sequence-points-reloaded

it not equivalent to writing i.operator i.operator or even syntactically simpler i.add i.inc Or do they too invoke undefined behavior..

What is the meaning of “… …” token? i.e. double ellipsis operator on parameter pack

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5625600/what-is-the-meaning-of-token-i-e-double-ellipsis-operator-on-paramet

The comma is purely optional 禮8.3.5 4 does say Where syntactically correct and where .. is not part of an abstract declarator .....

Template instantiation details of GCC and MS compilers

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7182359/template-instantiation-details-of-gcc-and-ms-compilers

endl int main Foo void foo foo.fun let_me_stay is checked syntactically and the syntax there is correct but not semantically i.e. it..