¡@

Home 

2014/10/16 ¤W¤È 12:05:43

jquery Programming Glossary: negligible

Performance of OR operation ( || ) vs inArray()

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10479056/performance-of-or-operation-vs-inarray

for more than 2 or 3 values. The performance difference is negligible while a function call and array creation certainly has some.. vs or but again the rather big performance difference is negligible in most cases since you are not going to execute the code millions..

Casting to string in JavaScript

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11083254/casting-to-string-in-javascript

undefined see jbabey's answer . Other than that there is a negligible performance difference which unless you're using them in huge..

Using 'window', 'document' and 'undefined' as arguments in anonymous function that wraps a jQuery plugin

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15777519/using-window-document-and-undefined-as-arguments-in-anonymous-function-th

to resolve these variables. I assert that the savings are negligible I personally wouldn't bother unless I used a lot of references..

jeditable performance in IE

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1750973/jeditable-performance-in-ie

be happy with that. Set up delay in WebKit and Firefox is negligible. Any thoughts or suggestions I haven't started reviewing or..

Do you Ajax JSON or HTML? [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3353434/do-you-ajax-json-or-html

efficient although gzip would probably make the difference negligible . jquery html ajax json share improve this question I would..

javascript Truncate string before comma

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4971961/javascript-truncate-string-before-comma

Performance of OR operation ( || ) vs inArray()

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10479056/performance-of-or-operation-vs-inarray

way. And that's in_array JavaScript array.indexOf value 0 for more than 2 or 3 values. The performance difference is negligible while a function call and array creation certainly has some overhead it doesn't matter compared to expensive operations..

Casting to string in JavaScript

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11083254/casting-to-string-in-javascript

returns null Very similar behaviour happens if value is undefined see jbabey's answer . Other than that there is a negligible performance difference which unless you're using them in huge loops isn't worth worrying about. share improve this answer..

Using 'window', 'document' and 'undefined' as arguments in anonymous function that wraps a jQuery plugin

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15777519/using-window-document-and-undefined-as-arguments-in-anonymous-function-th

variables to reference these will shorten the time it takes to resolve these variables. I assert that the savings are negligible I personally wouldn't bother unless I used a lot of references to window and or document . As for undefined the original..

jeditable performance in IE

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1750973/jeditable-performance-in-ie

delay is terrible already for a 10 row table. User's won't be happy with that. Set up delay in WebKit and Firefox is negligible. Any thoughts or suggestions I haven't started reviewing or profiling jeditable code for performance. And I'm thinking to..

Do you Ajax JSON or HTML? [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3353434/do-you-ajax-json-or-html

to both. 'a' is obviously easier whilst 'b' is more efficient although gzip would probably make the difference negligible . jquery html ajax json share improve this question I would say 'a' is the option you mostly want to stick with. It's..

javascript Truncate string before comma

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4971961/javascript-truncate-string-before-comma