¡@

Home 

python Programming Glossary: p.stdout

Running an interactive command from within python

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11457931/running-an-interactive-command-from-within-python

errQueue Queue outThread Thread target enqueue_output args p.stdout outQueue errThread Thread target enqueue_output args p.stderr..

Unbuffered read from process using subprocess in Python

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1183643/unbuffered-read-from-process-using-subprocess-in-python

shell True stdout subprocess.PIPE bufsize 0 for line in p.stdout print line I am trying this on MacOS 10.5 python subprocess.. doing some internal buffering on its own . Try this line p.stdout.readline while line print line line p.stdout.readline share..

Can you make a python subprocess output stdout and stderr as usual, but also capture the output as a string? [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12270645/can-you-make-a-python-subprocess-output-stdout-and-stderr-as-usual-but-also-cap

the command stdout subprocess.PIPE for line in iter p.stdout.readline '' print line output.append line However this solution.. if there is one will involve having asynchronous reads to p.stdout and p.stderr . Here is an example of what I would like to do.. stdout and stderr should behave as usual p_stdout p.stdout.read # unfortunately this will return '' unless you use subprocess.PIPE..

log syntax errors and uncaught exceptions for a python subprocess and print them to the terminal

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12508752/log-syntax-errors-and-uncaught-exceptions-for-a-python-subprocess-and-print-them

kwargs threads if stdout is not None threads.append tee p.stdout stdout sys.stdout if stderr is not None and stderr is not STDOUT.. STDOUT close_fds True bufsize 0 for c in iter lambda p.stdout.read 1 '' for f in sys.stdout file f.write c f.flush p.stdout.close.. 1 '' for f in sys.stdout file f.write c f.flush p.stdout.close rc p.wait Note the last example and tee based solution..

catching stdout in realtime from subprocess

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1606795/catching-stdout-in-realtime-from-subprocess

stderr subprocess.PIPE stdout subprocess.PIPE for line in p.stdout print str line.rstrip p.stdout.flush python subprocess stdout.. subprocess.PIPE for line in p.stdout print str line.rstrip p.stdout.flush python subprocess stdout share improve this question.. subprocess.PIPE stderr subprocess.STDOUT for line in iter p.stdout.readline b'' print line.rstrip That said it is very probable..

Python DBUS SESSION_BUS - X11 dependency

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2143785/python-dbus-session-bus-x11-dependency

stdout subprocess.PIPE stderr subprocess.STDOUT for var in p.stdout sp var.split ' ' 1 print sp os.environ sp 0 sp 1 1 share improve..

subprocess.Popen.stdout - reading stdout in real-time (again)

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3140189/subprocess-popen-stdout-reading-stdout-in-real-time-again

stdin subprocess.PIPE p.stdin.write '12345 n' for line in p.stdout print str line.rstrip p.stdout.flush So far whenever I read.. '12345 n' for line in p.stdout print str line.rstrip p.stdout.flush So far whenever I read form p.stdout it always waits until.. str line.rstrip p.stdout.flush So far whenever I read form p.stdout it always waits until the process is terminated and then outputs..

Python, Popen and select - waiting for a process to terminate or a timeout

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/337863/python-popen-and-select-waiting-for-a-process-to-terminate-or-a-timeout

seconds. I tried this SECONDS_TO_WAIT 10 select.select p.stdout p.stderr p.stdout p.stderr SECONDS_TO_WAIT but it just returns.. this SECONDS_TO_WAIT 10 select.select p.stdout p.stderr p.stdout p.stderr SECONDS_TO_WAIT but it just returns on either condition... it as follows SECONDS_TO_WAIT 10 select.select p.stderr p.stdout p.stderr SECONDS_TO_WAIT Since you would typically want to..

Non-blocking read on a subprocess.PIPE in python

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/375427/non-blocking-read-on-a-subprocess-pipe-in-python

'myprogram.exe' stdout subprocess.PIPE str p.stdout.readline python io subprocess nonblocking share improve this.. ON_POSIX q Queue t Thread target enqueue_output args p.stdout q t.daemon True # thread dies with the program t.start # .....

Convert Word doc to PDF - Python [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4818342/convert-word-doc-to-pdf-python

with open output_filename 'w' as output shutil.copyfileobj p.stdout output You can also look at unoconv 's source code if you want..

Python subprocess get children's output to file and terminal?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4984428/python-subprocess-get-childrens-output-to-file-and-terminal

Popen directly and use stdout PIPE argument to read from p.stdout import sys from subprocess import Popen PIPE from threading.. kwargs threads if stdout is not None threads.append tee p.stdout stdout sys.stdout if stderr is not None threads.append tee p.stderr..

Getting realtime output from ffmpeg to be used in progress bar (PyQt4, stdout)

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7632589/getting-realtime-output-from-ffmpeg-to-be-used-in-progress-bar-pyqt4-stdout

stderr subprocess.PIPE stdout subprocess.PIPE for line in p.stdout print OUTPUT str line.rstrip p.stdout.flush But when I change.. for line in p.stdout print OUTPUT str line.rstrip p.stdout.flush But when I change the command to ffmpeg i file.mp4 file.avi..

Getting realtime output using subprocess

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/803265/getting-realtime-output-using-subprocess

config' stdout PIPE stderr STDOUT shell True for line in p.stdout print line.replace ' n' '' After looking at the documentation.. so I wrote the following output loop while True try print p.stdout.next .replace ' n' '' except StopIteration break but got the.. tried this and for some reason while the code for line in p.stdout ... buffers aggressively the variant while True line p.stdout.readline..

Is there a way to poll a file handle returned from subprocess.Popen?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/883152/is-there-a-way-to-poll-a-file-handle-returned-from-subprocess-popen

p Popen myproc stderr STDOUT stdout PIPE Now if I do line p.stdout.readline my program waits until the subprocess outputs the next.. outputs the next line. Is there any magic I can do to p.stdout so that I could read the output if it's there but just continue.. I know I can just create a thread for reading p.stdout but let's assume I can't create new threads. python pipes subprocess..