c# Programming Glossary: atomicity

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1116249/manualresetevent-vs-thread-sleep

operations which is important for synchronization Some atomicity can be done in user space too with hardware support . In short..

Do I need to lock or mark as volatile when accessing a simple boolean flag in C#?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1222184/do-i-need-to-lock-or-mark-as-volatile-when-accessing-a-simple-boolean-flag-in-c

the threads never sees updates . For larger values where atomicity is an issue or where you want to synchronize a sequence of operations..

Why is there no overload of Interlocked.Add that accepts Doubles as parameters?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1400465/why-is-there-no-overload-of-interlocked-add-that-accepts-doubles-as-parameters

that accepts Doubles as parameters I fully appreciate the atomicity that the Threading.Interlocked class provides I don't understand..

When using object initializers, why does the compiler generate an extra local variable?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1679780/when-using-object-initializers-why-does-the-compiler-generate-an-extra-local-va

c# 3.0 share improve this question Thread safety and atomicity. First consider this line of code MyObject foo new MyObject..

reference assignment is atomic so why is Interlocked.Exchange(ref Object, Object) needed?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2192124/reference-assignment-is-atomic-so-why-is-interlocked-exchangeref-object-object

volatile What should I think about this c# multithreading atomicity volatility share improve this question There are numerous..

How To Start And Stop A Continuously Running Background Worker Using A Button

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3065700/how-to-start-and-stop-a-continuously-running-background-worker-using-a-button

locking mechanisms. Update Following the discussion around atomicity freshness of data and order of access here is an updated code..

Why doesn't this code demonstrate the non-atomicity of reads/writes?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3679209/why-doesnt-this-code-demonstrate-the-non-atomicity-of-reads-writes

doesn't this code demonstrate the non atomicity of reads writes Reading this question I wanted to test if I.. question I wanted to test if I could demonstrate the non atomicity of reads and writes on a type for which the atomicity of such.. non atomicity of reads and writes on a type for which the atomicity of such operations is not guaranteed. private static double..

Is a string property itself threadsafe?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/434890/is-a-string-property-itself-threadsafe

value of the variable property. That isn't guaranteed by atomicity . As a quick example here's a bad way to stop a thread class..

Can a C# thread really cache a value and ignore changes to that value on other threads?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/458173/can-a-c-sharp-thread-really-cache-a-value-and-ignore-changes-to-that-value-on-ot

other threads This question is NOT about race conditions atomicity or why you should use locks in your code. I already know about..

Is the ++ operator thread safe? [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4628243/is-the-operator-thread-safe

of other threading problems that have nothing to do with atomicity but which may still fall under some people's definitions of..

Byte for byte serialization of a struct in C#

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/628843/byte-for-byte-serialization-of-a-struct-in-c-sharp

optimise a bit you'll end up with unaligned access loss of atomicity etc. That may well not be relevant for you but it's worth bearing..