c# Programming Glossary: eligible
What does the tilde (~) mean in C#? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/188688/what-does-the-tilde-mean-in-c  They are only used with classes. An instance becomes eligible for destruction when it is no longer possible for any code to.. instance may occur at any time after the instance becomes eligible for destruction. When an instance is destructed the destructors.. 
 Is it possible to intercept (or be aware of) COM Reference counting on CLR objects exposed to COM http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2223147/is-it-possible-to-intercept-or-be-aware-of-com-reference-counting-on-clr-objec  find the CLR object the CCW wrapped and the CLR object is eligible for collection. Happy days all is well with the world. What.. 
 Timer, event and garbage collection : am I missing something? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2311027/timer-event-and-garbage-collection-am-i-missing-something  scope the Timer isn't referenced anywhere so it should be eligible for garbage collection. But when I click the GC button the timer.. 
 this.Dispose() doesn't release memory used by Form after closing it. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2940629/this-dispose-doesnt-release-memory-used-by-form-after-closing-it  in your OnClose override that will make the second form eligible for garbage collection. Note .NET garbage collector is quite.. before cleaning up all the older instances that were eligible for collection. A way to know for sure without resorting to.. 
 Do event handlers stop garbage collection from occuring? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/298261/do-event-handlers-stop-garbage-collection-from-occuring  as soon as the object publishing the event pClass above is eligible for collection this ceases to be a problem. Note that this is.. 
 How do events cause memory leaks in C# and how do Weak References help mitigate that? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3662842/how-do-events-cause-memory-leaks-in-c-sharp-and-how-do-weak-references-help-miti  null Even though we assign null to listener it will not be eligible for garbage collection since newSource is still holding a reference.. 
 Garbage collection when using anonymous delegates for event handling http://stackoverflow.com/questions/371109/garbage-collection-when-using-anonymous-delegates-for-event-handling  the weak reference and the handler pointer itself will be eligible for collection as well. handler null  publisher.EnabledChanged.. 
 Should I use struct or class? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3872816/should-i-use-struct-or-class  overgeneralization. A struct is not automatically eligible for the stack. A struct can be placed on the stack if and only.. 
 WCF HttpTransport: streamed vs buffered TransferMode http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4043683/wcf-httptransport-streamed-vs-buffered-transfermode  neither usable in a subsequent request e.g. too small nor eligible for GC. Now imagine you have multiple concurrent requests in.. 
 Does the Garbage Collector destroy temporarily unreferenced objects during async calls in .NET? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/421547/does-the-garbage-collector-destroy-temporarily-unreferenced-objects-during-async  this question   An object is considered alive and non eligible for garbage collection if any live thread contains a reference.. 
 When is it acceptable to call GC.Collect? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/478167/when-is-it-acceptable-to-call-gc-collect  those you suspect to be in generations 1 and 2 are now eligible for garbage collection and that now would be an appropriate.. 
 Is it necessary to explicitly remove event handlers in C# http://stackoverflow.com/questions/506092/is-it-necessary-to-explicitly-remove-event-handlers-in-c-sharp  other way round. In your case the publisher is going to be eligible for garbage collection assuming there are no other references.. End of Main method. Subscriber is about to  become eligible for collection GC.KeepAlive subscriber  Results in .NET 3.5SP1.. 
 Calling null on a class vs Dispose() http://stackoverflow.com/questions/574019/calling-null-on-a-class-vs-dispose  x sb.ToString The string and StringBuilder are already eligible for garbage collection here int y 10 DoSomething y These aren't.. finalizer won't help the stream will almost certainly be eligible for garbage collection when your object is so you can just rely.. 
 Is it possible to have a memory leak in managed code? (specifically C# 3.0) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6436620/is-it-possible-to-have-a-memory-leak-in-managed-code-specifically-c-sharp-3-0  no way of getting to an object it's considered garbage and eligible for collection. As for how memory leaks are possible in managed.. 
 Do static members ever get garbage collected? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6600093/do-static-members-ever-get-garbage-collected 
 
 
     
      |