¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: c90

What are the incompatible differences betweeen C(99) and C++(11)?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10461331/what-are-the-incompatible-differences-betweeen-c99-and-c11

of C and C sometimes called clean C which is not quite C90 you have to consider 3 types of incompatibilities Additional..

Is std::stoi actually safe to use?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11598990/is-stdstoi-actually-safe-to-use

so that no conversion can be performed. The following C90 C99 C11 program will confirm it experimentally #include stdio.h..

Why default return value of main is 0 and not EXIT_SUCCESS?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1188335/why-default-return-value-of-main-is-0-and-not-exit-success

not have to return zero to the host environment. From the C90 C99 C 98 standard document If the value of status is zero or..

Passing a constant array to a function in C/C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1269568/passing-a-constant-array-to-a-function-in-c-c

this question You can do it in C99 but not ANSI C C90 or any current variant of C with compound literals . See section.. return 0 GCC also provides this as an extension to C90. If you compile with std gnu90 the default std c99 or std gnu99..

Can code that is valid in both C and C++ produce different behavior when compiled in each language?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12887700/can-code-that-is-valid-in-both-c-and-c-produce-different-behavior-when-compile

recent versions of each standard e.g. say C 98 and C90 or later If the versions matter then please mention which versions..

Efficient unsigned-to-signed cast avoiding implementation-defined behavior

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13150449/efficient-unsigned-to-signed-cast-avoiding-implementation-defined-behavior

climits from Standard C but now Standard C means C89 C90. All of these C 98 C 03 C89 C90 have the wording I give in my.. now Standard C means C89 C90. All of these C 98 C 03 C89 C90 have the wording I give in my question but also include this.. under specified behavior for signed integers in C89 C90 that got inherited by C 98 C 03. It is fixed in C99 and C 11..

dereferencing the null pointer

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2896689/dereferencing-the-null-pointer

it depends which language standard you are following . In C90 and C this is not valid because you perform indirection on the..

What belongs in an educational tool to demonstrate the unwarranted assumptions people make in C/C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3457967/what-belongs-in-an-educational-tool-to-demonstrate-the-unwarranted-assumptions-p

sizeof unsigned int this is true for C99 but not for C90. EXPECT 18 a b has the same sign as a 10 3 1 10 3 1 suggested..

Relationship between C and C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4388606/relationship-between-c-and-c

share improve this question C is a near superset of C89 C90. I don't recommend writing the code with the purpose of being..

System where 1 byte != 8 bit?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5516044/system-where-1-byte-8-bit

at least as far back as the C89 standard. Edit For example C90 §5.2.4.2.1 requires CHAR_BIT 8 and UCHAR_MAX 255. C89 uses a..

Where do I find the current C or C++ standard documents?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/81656/where-do-i-find-the-current-c-or-c-standard-documents

9899 1999 30 from ansi.org available online free of charge C90 &ndash AS 3955 1991 141 from ansi.org the Australian version.. AS 3955 1991 141 from ansi.org the Australian version of C90 identical to ISO 9899 1990 Note that the C90 standard is much.. version of C90 identical to ISO 9899 1990 Note that the C90 standard is much more useful than the significantly different..

ULL suffix on a numeric literal

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8809292/ull-suffix-on-a-numeric-literal

64 bits wide and as an extension GCC supports them in C90 mode and in C . Simply write long long int for a signed integer..