¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: dangerUnderstanding the benefits of move semantics vs template metaprogramming http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10725299/understanding-the-benefits-of-move-semantics-vs-template-metaprogramming must be kept in their correct order if there's any danger of an exception being thrown because if any part of A B C D..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/135069/ifdef-vs-if-which-is-better-safer-as-a-method-for-enabling-disabling-compila because there is always something defined and there's no danger it could destroy other defines elsewhere. c c coding style..
Is there any danger in calling free() or delete instead of delete[]? [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1612031/is-there-any-danger-in-calling-free-or-delete-instead-of-delete there any danger in calling free or delete instead of delete duplicate Possible..
gcc - significance of -pthread flag when compiling http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2127797/gcc-significance-of-pthread-flag-when-compiling and just pass lpthread to the linking stage. Is there any danger not compiling and linking with the pthread flag i.e. what does..
What uses are there for “placement new”? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/222557/what-uses-are-there-for-placement-new performance and exception safety are paramount there's no danger of allocation failure since the memory has already been allocated..
Is it safe to use STL (TR1) shared_ptr's between modules (exes and dlls) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/345003/is-it-safe-to-use-stl-tr1-shared-ptrs-between-modules-exes-and-dlls knows what what a shared_ptr is static linking is my only danger for now... . I thought I've read that boost's version of a shared_ptr..
Do rvalue references allow dangling references? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3716277/do-rvalue-references-allow-dangling-references std string string middle_name return Jaan int main string danger middle_name return 0 This doesn't compute anything but it compiles.. error and demonstrates something that I find confusing danger is a dangling reference isn't it c c 0x rvalue share improve.. however string middle_name return Jaan int main string nodanger middle_name OK. The life time of the temporary is extended to..
Why is inlining considered faster than a function call? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4016061/why-is-inlining-considered-faster-than-a-function-call context. The price of that is obviously the potential danger of code bloat but if used correctly it can provide noticeable..
Why should I avoid multiple inheritance in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/406081/why-should-i-avoid-multiple-inheritance-in-c fully UNRELATED... This is what reduces drastically the danger of multiple inheritance 5. So should I do Multiple Inheritance..
Is it safe to “upcast” a method pointer and use it with base class pointer? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4272909/is-it-safe-to-upcast-a-method-pointer-and-use-it-with-base-class-pointer and only appears once in D's inheritance diagram. The danger inherent in upcasting method pointers is that you could call..
Is there any case where a return of a RValue Reference (&&) is useful? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5770253/is-there-any-case-where-a-return-of-a-rvalue-reference-is-useful or a idiom or pattern MyClass func ... I am aware of the danger returning references in general but sometimes we do it anyway..
How to initialize nested structures in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/629433/how-to-initialize-nested-structures-in-c points looks like this then 5 5 5 5 Now you could see the danger of using brace elision. If you add some member to your struct..
difference between a macro and a const in c++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6393776/difference-between-a-macro-and-a-const-in-c it makes a good illustration of both the power and the danger of macros for the latter consider what it would do if it was..
Trailing return types, decltype and const-ness http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7255379/trailing-return-types-decltype-and-const-ness N3291. So GCC was right less than 6 months ago that's the danger of writing code to a moving specification. share improve this..
Does using leading underscores actually cause trouble? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9996909/does-using-leading-underscores-actually-cause-trouble But what if I just don't care What if I decide to live dangerously and use these reserved identifiers anyway Just how dangerously.. and use these reserved identifiers anyway Just how dangerously would I be living Have you ever actually seen a compiler.. to the specific complier you will use. Regarding the danger level every time you'll get a bug you will have to wonder if..
|