¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: paragraph

C and C++ : Partial initialization of automatic structure

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10828294/c-and-c-partial-initialization-of-automatic-structure

int array 10 Case 3 No Initialization The quoted paragraph describes the behavior for Case 3 . The rules regarding Partial..

What is the difference between NULL, '\0' and 0

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1296843/what-is-the-difference-between-null-0-and-0

C/C++: Force Bit Field Order and Alignment

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1490092/c-c-force-bit-field-order-and-alignment

not fully portable. In addition to that C99 §6.7.2.1 paragraph 10 says The order of allocation of bit fields within a unit..

Unnamed/anonymous namespaces vs. static functions

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/154469/unnamed-anonymous-namespaces-vs-static-functions

The C Standard reads in section 7.3.1.1 Unnamed namespaces paragraph 2 The use of the static keyword is deprecated when declaring..

How to implement serialization in C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1809670/how-to-implement-serialization-in-c

implementation of a object factory mentioned in the above paragraph. A class for creating objects with the type of object created..

Why is `i = ++i + 1` unspecified behavior?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1860461/why-is-i-i-1-unspecified-behavior

C Standard ISO IEC 14882 2003 E citation section 5 paragraph 4 Except where noted the order of evaluation of operands of.. determine the value to be stored. The requirements of this paragraph shall be met for each allowable ordering of the subexpressions..

Why should I not try to use “this” value after “delete this”?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1866461/why-should-i-not-try-to-use-this-value-after-delete-this

this&rdquo value after &ldquo delete this&rdquo In this paragraph of C FAQ usage of delete this construct is discussed. 4 restrictions..

Should operator<< be implemented as a friend or as a member function?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/236801/should-operator-be-implemented-as-a-friend-or-as-a-member-function

I could probably do ostream operator ostream os return os paragraph What rationale should I base this decision on Note Paragraph.. I base this decision on Note Paragraph to_str return paragraph where paragraph's a string. c operator overloading share.. decision on Note Paragraph to_str return paragraph where paragraph's a string. c operator overloading share improve this question..

Undefined, unspecified and implementation-defined behavior

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2397984/undefined-unspecified-and-implementation-defined-behavior

What does this program do According to section 2.14.5 paragraph 11 of the C standard it invokes undefined behavior The effect..

C++ preprocessor #define-ing a keyword. Is it standards conforming?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2726204/c-preprocessor-define-ing-a-keyword-is-it-standards-conforming

identical to keywords. The second sentence of that paragraph has been changed in C 0x to outright forbid #define ing a keyword..

Is the return type part of the function signature?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/290038/is-the-return-type-part-of-the-function-signature

what differs only by return type means though. Standard paragraph references When can a function declaration be overloaded 13.1..

Why does left shift operation invoke Undefined Behaviour when the left side operand has negative value?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3784996/why-does-left-shift-operation-invoke-undefined-behaviour-when-the-left-side-oper

shift language lawyer share improve this question The paragraph you copied is talking about unsigned types. The behavior is..

Is short-circuiting boolean operators mandated in C/C++? And evaluation order?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/628526/is-short-circuiting-boolean-operators-mandated-in-c-c-and-evaluation-order

and . Footnote 12 The operators indicated in this paragraph are the built in operators as described in clause 5. When one..

Why should `new` be used as little as possible?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6500313/why-should-new-be-used-as-little-as-possible

automatic storage as often as possible Basically the last paragraph sums it up. Using automatic storage as often as possible makes..

Difference between try-catch syntax for function

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6756931/difference-between-try-catch-syntax-for-function

handlers. For Standardese Fans C standard clause 15.3 paragraph 15 If a return statement appears in a handler of the function.. the program is ill formed. C standard clause 15.3 paragraph 16 The exception being handled is rethrown if control reaches..

Address of register variable

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1256246/address-of-register-variable

specifier register is sizeof . And from Section 7.1.1 Paragraph 3 of the C standard pdf A register specifier has the same semantics..

Why aren't my include guards preventing recursive inclusion and multiple symbol definitions?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14909997/why-arent-my-include-guards-preventing-recursive-inclusion-and-multiple-symbol

depth limit. This limit is implementation specific. Per Paragraph 16.2 6 of the C 11 Standard A #include preprocessing directive.. once and since this violates the One Definition Rule . Per Paragraph 3.2 3 of the C 11 Standard Every program shall contain exactly.. to tolerate multiple symbol definitions. According to Paragraph 3.2 5 of the C 11 Standard There can be more than one definition..

Does initialization entail lvalue-to-rvalue conversion? Is `int x = x;` UB?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14935722/does-initialization-entail-lvalue-to-rvalue-conversion-is-int-x-x-ub

and when not specified otherwise . For instance a note in Paragraph 3.10 1 says The discussion of each built in operator in Clause.. lvalue to rvalue conversion is mentioned again in a note Paragraph 5.17 1 Therefore a function call shall not intervene between.. above. Traces supporting this belief can be found even in Paragraph 8.5.2 5 about the initialization of references for which the..

Should operator<< be implemented as a friend or as a member function?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/236801/should-operator-be-implemented-as-a-friend-or-as-a-member-function

personal case is friend ostream operator ostream os const Paragraph p return os p.to_str But I could probably do ostream operator.. What rationale should I base this decision on Note Paragraph to_str return paragraph where paragraph's a string. c operator.. is automatically a friend of itself so objects of type Paragraph can examine each other even each others private members . There..