c++ Programming Glossary: parsers

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1042855/boost-and-xml-c

1 . Exact numbers can be seen in Comparison with existing parsers section. extremely high parsing speed the win over pugxml is.. consumption. Ok I'm repeating myself. Again. When other parsers will allow you to provide XML file in a constant storage or..

Is there a reason to not use Boost? [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1226206/is-there-a-reason-to-not-use-boost

using Boost.Spirit when everybody else is creating their parsers with Bison. And so on. Smart pointers are near ubiquitous because..

pass attribute to child rule in boost spirit

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12520649/pass-attribute-to-child-rule-in-boost-spirit

container attributes. The thing is for performance reasons parsers won't undo 'rollback' changes to their underlying containers..

Programatically get Google search results

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1397313/programatically-get-google-search-results

“Best” Input File Formats for C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14699829/best-input-file-formats-for-c

parse it. Granted there are few efficient stream based XML parsers out there but in general any XML parser will be quite memory..

Advantages of Antlr (versus say, lex/yacc/bison) [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/212900/advantages-of-antlr-versus-say-lex-yacc-bison

any product we ship will not include Java so the resulting parsers would have to follow that rule. c antlr yacc bison share.. an LL parser whereas YACC and Bison both generate parsers that are LALR. This is an important distinction for a number..

Why can't C++ be parsed with a LR(1) parser?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/243383/why-cant-c-be-parsed-with-a-lr1-parser

can't C be parsed with a LR 1 parser I was reading about parsers and parser generators and found this statement in wikipedia's.. property of C causes it to be impossible to parse with LR parsers Using google I only found that C can be perfectly parsed with..

References Needed for Implementing an Interpreter in C/C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/294852/references-needed-for-implementing-an-interpreter-in-c-c

couple of compilers and several data language translators parsers but I've never actually written an interpreter before. The prototype..

boost spirit semantic action parameters

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3066701/boost-spirit-semantic-action-parameters

x0 and a local to pass information between individual parsers with the rule . Here's the full example. #include boost spirit..

Copy or reference semantics of boost::spirit's rule<>?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3470668/copy-or-reference-semantics-of-boostspirits-rule

rules are now behaving as expected when handled outside of parsers. You can store them normally in containers the assignment operator..

Storing multiple messages in one protocol buffer binary file

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5586323/storing-multiple-messages-in-one-protocol-buffer-binary-file

wire format is not self delimiting so protocol buffer parsers cannot determine where a message ends on their own. The easiest..

Best practices for writing a programming language parser

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/570144/best-practices-for-writing-a-programming-language-parser

the parser generator possible but it also makes hand coded parsers a lot simpler. What you end up with is one or two functions..

Boost::Spirit Expression Parser

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8464969/boostspirit-expression-parser

longer applies Spirit still generates LL recursive descent parsers so the concept behind left recursion still applies. The code..

Boolean expression (grammar) parser in c++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8706356/boolean-expression-grammar-parser-in-c

Spirit. Because Boost Spirit generates recursive descent parsers based on expression templates honouring the 'idiosyncratic'..

What XML parser should I use in C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9387610/what-xml-parser-should-i-use-in-c

there's no such thing as a free lunch. Like most XML parsers that don't care about the XML specification Rapid XML doesn't.. slot because it is about as braindead simple to use as XML parsers get. Yes it's slow but it's simple and obvious. It has a lot..