¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: prohibitWhy do we need a pure virtual destructor in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1219607/why-do-we-need-a-pure-virtual-destructor-in-c that pure virtual destructors are allowed is that to prohibit them would mean adding another rule to the language and there's..
Could a C++ implementation, in theory, parallelise the evaluation of two function arguments? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13443532/could-a-c-implementation-in-theory-parallelise-the-evaluation-of-two-functio issues but beyond that restriction I can't see anything to prohibit it. So does the standard allow it Even if only by the as if..
Is it true that there is no need to learn C because C++ contains everything? [closed] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/145096/is-it-true-that-there-is-no-need-to-learn-c-because-c-contains-everything article has further differences as well C compilers prohibit goto from crossing an initialization as in the following C99..
Why is `i = ++i + 1` unspecified behavior? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1860461/why-is-i-i-1-unspecified-behavior consider only my case i i 1 . Why does the C Standard prohibit such expressions c standards variable assignment share improve..
does c++ standard prohibit the void main() prototype? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1915659/does-c-standard-prohibit-the-void-main-prototype c standard prohibit the void main prototype In section 3.6.1.2 of both C Standard.. do not sure what does but otherwise means.Whether it is to prohibit the other return type or to give the right to C compiler writer.. share improve this question The english you quote does prohibit declaring main to return void . It is allowing variation in..
Coding Practices which enable the compiler/optimizer to make a faster program http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2074099/coding-practices-which-enable-the-compiler-optimizer-to-make-a-faster-program into production. There may be constructs in your code that prohibit the optimizer from doing the best job that it can. What can.. it can. What can you do to refactor that will remove these prohibitions and allow the optimizer to generate even faster code Edit..
How might I wrap the FindXFile-style APIs to the STL-style Iterator Pattern in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2531874/how-might-i-wrap-the-findxfile-style-apis-to-the-stl-style-iterator-pattern-in-c path WIN32_FIND_DATA data bool done DWORD require DWORD prohibit public WIN32_FIND_DATA operator return data dir_iterator dir_iterator.. data other.data done other.done require other.require prohibit other.prohibit Transfer the handle instead of just copying it... done other.done require other.require prohibit other.prohibit Transfer the handle instead of just copying it. other.it INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE..
Why exactly is calling the destructor for the second time undefined behavior in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2771567/why-exactly-is-calling-the-destructor-for-the-second-time-undefined-behavior-in looks working. Even C definition of UB doesn't directly prohibit things qualified as UB from working. So for the code above to..
What's the most reliable way to prohibit a copy constructor in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5702100/whats-the-most-reliable-way-to-prohibit-a-copy-constructor-in-c the most reliable way to prohibit a copy constructor in C Sometimes it's necessary to prohibit.. a copy constructor in C Sometimes it's necessary to prohibit a copy constructor in a C class so that class becomes non copyable.. class becomes non copyable . Of course operator should be prohibited at the same time. So far I've seen two ways to do that. Way..
Conversion from Derived** to Base** http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8026040/conversion-from-derived-to-base actually allow the conversion but the mutable collections prohibit it. Same with your example. If there was a conversion from Derived..
Is namespace-`static` still deprecated in C++11? [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8460191/is-namespace-static-still-deprecated-in-c11 C 2011 suggesting undeprecation and 7.1.1 doesn't seem to prohibit namespace static and if it had this would suggest that the feature..
Should I use an exception specifier in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/88573/should-i-use-an-exception-specifier-in-c some unknown exception. Exception specifications tend to prohibit extensibility. virtual void open throw FileNotFound might evolve..
|