¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: pthread_mutex_unlockHow to sleep or pause a PThread in c on Linux http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1606400/how-to-sleep-or-pause-a-pthread-in-c-on-linux paused pthread_cond_wait cond lock Wait for play signal pthread_mutex_unlock lock Continue playback Then to play you can do this pthread_mutex_lock.. pthread_mutex_lock lock play 1 pthread_cond_signal cond pthread_mutex_unlock lock And to pause pthread_mutex_lock lock play 0 pthread_mutex_unlock..
wait and notify in C/C++ shared memory http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2085511/wait-and-notify-in-c-c-shared-memory synchronized on the Java object use pthread_mutex_lock and pthread_mutex_unlock note that in C you have to pair these yourself manually . If..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3372703/volatile-and-multithreading wait int i do usleep 1000 pthead_mutex_lock mutex i ready pthread_mutex_unlock mutex while i 0 printf Finished n signal pthead_mutex_lock mutex.. 0 printf Finished n signal pthead_mutex_lock mutex ready 1 pthread_mutex_unlock mutex We spawn two threads we call wait in one thread and then..
A very simple thread pool using pthreads in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3561095/a-very-simple-thread-pool-using-pthreads-in-c false else workOnMe inQueue.front inQueue.pop_front pthread_mutex_unlock inQueueLock if somethingTodo break workOnMe thread taskString.. outQueueLock outQueue.push_back workOnMe pthread_mutex_unlock outQueueLock pthread_exit NULL int main int argc char argv unsigned.. inQueueLock comp_START comp_TODO inQueue.size pthread_mutex_unlock inQueueLock pthread_mutex_lock outQueueLock comp_DONE outQueue.size..
Calling pthread_cond_signal without locking mutex http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4544234/calling-pthread-cond-signal-without-locking-mutex mutex while condition FALSE pthread_cond_wait cond mutex pthread_mutex_unlock mutex Process B incorrect condition TRUE pthread_cond_signal.. mutex condition TRUE pthread_cond_signal cond pthread_mutex_unlock mutex ...then the above cannot occur the wakeup will never be.. can actually move the pthread_cond_signal itself after the pthread_mutex_unlock but this can result in less optimal scheduling of threads and..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5536759/condition-variable-why-calling-pthread-cond-signal-before-calling-pthread-co mutex while condition pthread_cond_wait cond mutex pthread_mutex_unlock mutex Thread 2 changes the condition and signals the change.. waiting or not pthread_mutex_lock mutex changeCondition pthread_mutex_unlock mutex pthread_cond_signal cond The bottom line is the communication..
Using a class function in int main() http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5624690/using-a-class-function-in-int-main Available void signalSemaphore pthread_mutex_t thread pthread_mutex_unlock thread Makes value 0 Available void deleteSemaphore pthread_mutex_t..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5799924/thread-wait-for-parent m mutex m pthread_mutex_lock mutex ~MutexLock pthread_mutex_unlock mutex private pthread_mutex_t mutex The base class of all work..
Throwing exceptions from constructors http://stackoverflow.com/questions/810839/throwing-exceptions-from-constructors mutex_ 0 throw MutexLockException void unlock if pthread_mutex_unlock mutex_ 0 throw MutexUnlockException private pthread_mutex_t..
|